Anyone knows if this its realistic? The turret armor looks very thin to protect the ammo belt from a 125mm HE (that can even kill mbts from the roof)
1 Like
And the new F/A-18E, with its combat rating of 14.3 in EPIRB and 13.0 in GRB, is simply ridiculous. Meanwhile, the Su-30MK2 immediately added excellent CAS missiles and a pleasing 12.3 BR. This is despite its missiles outperforming the Mavericks in every way.
1 Like
lol, I’m a multination player.
Su-30’sMK’s missile capability is good but nothing special, as long as top tier remains 14.3 it will not receive br increase.
Aim-120’s are much better than base R77 that you can find on Su-30MK.
lol wut.
F-15C demolishes premium Su-30’s in terms of flight performance.
1 Like
The Terminator’s armor was deliberately given broken armor, which would cause the server to miscalculate damage.
This is why youre the star of the thread when it comes to these takes. Ah yes a 6xfox3 platform old and bad fm vs a 8xfox3s with a ultimately good fm/radar/datalink channels.
Radar as well is massively better with more datalink channels that off in su30Mk2.
Ignore this guy lol
2 Likes
Didn’t even need to mention that, lol.
I have Chinese premium Su-30 and the only reason I bought its because I love collecting unique vehicles which MKK is one of them.
Bein able to carry R73+R27ET and PL12 makes a deadly combo and better plane than Russian premium Su-30 in my book.
1 Like
The Su-30MK2 is faster than the F-15 CGE. But the worst part is that the AIM-120 is unsuitable for close combat; it’s inferior in maneuverability to the R-77. And since the F-15CGE lacks speed, it can’t reach the required speed and altitude to successfully launch an AIM-120.
Of course, it will never receive an increased ballistic missile rating, no matter what. After all, its competitors, the F-16ADF, only have six missiles, compared to the Su-30MK2’s 12.
What does radar have to do with it? The F-15CGE, like the F/A-18E, has no speed. Have you ever flown an AIM-120? They don’t fly without initial velocity; they simply lose speed after a few dozen kilometers and crash.
What do you think of the F-15C’s 13.7 combat rating? It’s worse than the premium Su-30MK2 in every way. Or what about the F/A-18C Late’s combat rating? It’s just a joke: 14.0. A plane with no speed, no proper radar, flies 0.7 higher than the Su-30MK2.
Tell me you never flew Su-30 and F-15C without telling me.
F-15C’s acceleration,rate of climb and level flight speed is and dogfight capabilities are much better than Su-30’s.
Ah yes the only good thing about R77, meanwhile Aim-120’s time to reach target is much better while having less drag,more range and similiar agility.
F-16ADF shits on Su-30 in terms of flight performance, Fox-3 missiles, radar and dogfight capabilities.
In my opinion only thing ADF lacks is the Aim-9M which should already been added considering many planes at 13.0-13.3 is carrying IRCCM missiles.
Sorry but I don’t see any reasonable opinion that is coming from you.
1 Like
This is completely false, the 30mk2 is tons heavier and still retains the old engines, it is not faster than F15CGE and lacks the FM for even dogfighting or general Air Rb performance. F15C GE has 12 missiles and has actually higher top speed than the F15E. Stop spreading misinformation. And R-77s have trash range lmao, u can crank and watch those airbrake machines fall.
You guys are the same people who asked the ADF and MLU variants to get fox3s, Even tho they would have been better at 12.7, now deal with what you got.
Su30mk2 has 10 missiles, and 6 Fox3s being R-77s vs 6 aim120s… Go figure.
Please dont compare hornet and F15C in terms of speed. 15CGE has a mach2.25+ Top speed while the hornet tops at around 1.6
Do we need to get General Lee in here to convince you or what lol?
4 Likes
LOLLLLL
WUTTTTT.
Is this next level of rage baiting or something?
What’s next you’re gonna tell me F-15E is worse than premium Su-30’s?
10/10 ragebait.
3 Likes
It’s not ragebait thats the main issue here
1 Like
That’s even worse…
1 Like
the thread seems to cultivate stupidity & blatant ignorance
1 Like
Abrams lower plate is at least double the size of t seires, on top the t series dont have turret baskets that eliminate horizontal drive if it gets hit. So hes not wrong
I mean if you are exposing your whole lower plate as an Abram then something must have gone very wrong.
Yes, the map design, which seems to favor flat urban maps.
2 Likes
There a lot more to it than just map.
Considering they are adding bigger and bigger map , yeah no. Map is definitely not the main reason
Map definitely is the main reason, how do i hide my lower front plate on sweden, advance to the rhine, and sun city???
Sure but you cant claim its easy to not expose Abrams LFP on maps such as Sweden, Sun City and Advance to Rhine when all of the important positions dont offer appropriate cover.
2 Likes