yeah lol, cuz they’re paid. It’s already been publicly aknowledged
2 Likes
Given they all actively fought against APHE getting realistically modeled… their opinions can 0 weight.
8 Likes
Just be careful as the next one might be perma
Except for the ones that talk about objective double standards which are true no matter if its john warthunder or a chimpanzee playing
Russian bias is not about vehicles being op, its about vehicles being op due to blatant preferential treatment no one else gets
2 Likes
Ah yes, you’ve figured it out!
How convenient of you to dismiss these players’ opinions, especially when these players have infinitely better game knowledge and skill than you do and thus can be far more trustworthy to provide non-biased and well-informed statements regarding the game and it’s tech trees.
Anyways, I’m outta here because I’m getting dragged down into the mud once again.
Might as well. Censorship at its prime. Reddit will be glad to learn about it.
I form my own opinions and not listen to Gaijins propagandarists.
Anyone with more than 1 brain cell can clearly see the BMPT is a MAJOR issue.
If a CC says that its fine, then its clear they are just enjoying all the free kills
5 Likes
it literally isnt tho? I complain about the BMPT being horrendously OP didn’t stop me from complaining about the T58 or the Gripen E
Funnily enough you can play the same game just with different CCs. Ask Corb how balanced the 38MT is or spookston if the BMPT is fair
Here is actually quite lenient, steam forum on the other hand…
You think that steam forums are less lenient than the WT forum ? From my experience it’s quite the exact opposite
That’s the main problem with this vehicle: it’s a Br 10.3, with Br 10.3 guns, but with Br 12.3 armor, so Br 10.3 ammunition falls far short. In garage tests, shots between the tracks often do nothing, the bullets being stopped by the relikt, or if they do penetrate, the damage is stopped by the fuel tank and the spall line. Meanwhile, the BMPT has an incredible ability to break guns and tracks, leaving tanks defenseless.
10.3 guns … honnestly it’s 11.0 guns and 12.0 missiles
Was thinking the same, it can literally one shot 11.7/12.0 tanks with its ATGMs
You only have to look at the Soyuz for a great example.
A ship the Soviets could not have built, added to the game using armour values which are a Soviet wet dream along with guns which have an absurd fire rate etc.
Then you have the kh-38MT - a missile gaijin just invented the stats for and which never went past the mockup stage but here we are.
They’re full of double standards.
3 Likes
honnestly that’s my main issue with modern tech. Stop adding it ! We don’t know how they perform and the game has switched from realistic tank combat to WoT bis autocannons hide and seek
They also have zero incentive to rock the boat. Lots of them have it as their sole income source, it’s not surprising they’re scared to upset gaijin and call out their hypocrisy.
The only time it came close was when spookston shit in them over the rdf/lt.
Someone is mass reporting again - get a life.
6 Likes
Too bad you didn’t use your additional brain cell to read.
Valve does that i think they know more about it than people who make up stuff and block opinion they don’t like.
Sadly as much as most of everyone seems to know this thing is just disgusting and we’re all eagerly awaiting for a miracle br increase for Christmas I don’t put much faith in that happening and the even sadder thought is the holidays are about to start I’m bracing for a second wave of cancer and trying to find a nice br to ride it out in. So far 8.7 or 11.7 seems to be about the sweet spot……
1 Like
There’s not going to be a br increase for a while sadly.
The current state of it is intentional, and ironically things like this thread boost sales as people rush to buy the op thing.
Gaijin know it’s ridiculous and corrosive to keep it at the current br, but it makes them money so they don’t give a crap.
3 Likes