lol i got banned from the forums at least ten times for arguing with mods so not my first time
1 Like
OP vehicles for other nations always get nerfed.
look at the Fox, Gripen, Harrier GR1, etc etc.
Heck, even the Typhoon is still massively underperforming.
Soviet vehicles consistantly get ignored and left to be strong for far far longer than everyone else and the rules dont apply to them. Just look at KH-38MT. 100% fake weapon, was just a mockup, never fired. But god forbid anyone else gets something similar that would be unfair.
2 Likes
The number of Russian Bias complaints would be cut in half if people actually played all the game’s tech trees instead of just one.
There’s a reason why none of the most knowledgeable and skilled players (Oxy, DEFYN, Coppen, Cavenub, Hazeyy, BPA_Jon, etc. etc) that play all of the game’s tech trees think there’s any bias.
Meanwhile, all of the Russian Bias complaints consistently come from low-skilled players that’ve never even played a single high tier Russian vehicle in their lives.
Like I said, every nation gets horrendously OP vehicles, but the trend is that whenever Russia gets one it’s proof of bias, but when a non-Russian tech gets one, it’s all fine and dandy.
\/
3 Likes
looks at KV 220 …
yeah lol, cuz they’re paid. It’s already been publicly aknowledged
2 Likes
Given they all actively fought against APHE getting realistically modeled… their opinions can 0 weight.
8 Likes
Just be careful as the next one might be perma
Except for the ones that talk about objective double standards which are true no matter if its john warthunder or a chimpanzee playing
Russian bias is not about vehicles being op, its about vehicles being op due to blatant preferential treatment no one else gets
2 Likes
Ah yes, you’ve figured it out!
How convenient of you to dismiss these players’ opinions, especially when these players have infinitely better game knowledge and skill than you do and thus can be far more trustworthy to provide non-biased and well-informed statements regarding the game and it’s tech trees.
Anyways, I’m outta here because I’m getting dragged down into the mud once again.
Might as well. Censorship at its prime. Reddit will be glad to learn about it.
I form my own opinions and not listen to Gaijins propagandarists.
Anyone with more than 1 brain cell can clearly see the BMPT is a MAJOR issue.
If a CC says that its fine, then its clear they are just enjoying all the free kills
5 Likes
it literally isnt tho? I complain about the BMPT being horrendously OP didn’t stop me from complaining about the T58 or the Gripen E
Funnily enough you can play the same game just with different CCs. Ask Corb how balanced the 38MT is or spookston if the BMPT is fair
Here is actually quite lenient, steam forum on the other hand…
You think that steam forums are less lenient than the WT forum ? From my experience it’s quite the exact opposite
That’s the main problem with this vehicle: it’s a Br 10.3, with Br 10.3 guns, but with Br 12.3 armor, so Br 10.3 ammunition falls far short. In garage tests, shots between the tracks often do nothing, the bullets being stopped by the relikt, or if they do penetrate, the damage is stopped by the fuel tank and the spall line. Meanwhile, the BMPT has an incredible ability to break guns and tracks, leaving tanks defenseless.
10.3 guns … honnestly it’s 11.0 guns and 12.0 missiles
Was thinking the same, it can literally one shot 11.7/12.0 tanks with its ATGMs
You only have to look at the Soyuz for a great example.
A ship the Soviets could not have built, added to the game using armour values which are a Soviet wet dream along with guns which have an absurd fire rate etc.
Then you have the kh-38MT - a missile gaijin just invented the stats for and which never went past the mockup stage but here we are.
They’re full of double standards.
3 Likes
honnestly that’s my main issue with modern tech. Stop adding it ! We don’t know how they perform and the game has switched from realistic tank combat to WoT bis autocannons hide and seek