BMPT/72 BR Topic

Had a match yesterday it was 5 of us versus one bmpt left. We ganged up on him and of course i joined in. I was in a type 90 so i was already in a “superior” vehicle this guy had a bmpt as a backup.

We tracked him shot him everywhere and somehow he took little to no damage i kept hitting his engine…nothing…we barly had time to find his weak spots because he proceeded to basically one shot all of us and killed us all.

The problem isnt the gun its the magic survivability this thing has

1 Like

i went in to full top tier i’d rather face the kh38’s

1 Like

Hopefully there will be a BR hotfix on Monday. This is rediculous. It greatly surpasses even 11.3 IFV, how can It be that low BRed?

1 Like

The missiles alone are so much better, more reliable, and useable than the SPIKES on the PUMA/Namer, it’s ridiculous.

I mean, that’s pretty easy to explain. PUMA VTJF and Namer are both quite overtiered, especially for how bad the Spikes are. This thing meanwhile is insanely undertiered.

Getting ready for another day discussing about the BMPT

Acomodarse La Corbata Lautaro Rodriguez GIF - Acomodarse La Corbata Lautaro Rodriguez Cantando2020 - Discover & Share GIFs

2 Likes

Well, to point out something is OP you inherently have to defend the vehicle itself.
And RU mains refuse to defend their vehicles as a rule.

The fact I’m defending BMPT in order to support it moving up in BR due to it being OP is itself telling.

RU mains should praise their equipment, but they don’t.
Yet 10 tech tree players are defending the BMPT, and showcasing how it’s OP and needs to be moved up.

Especially when the hull is the only actual weakspot for it, and the hull is a T-72B equivalent hull, the best of any vehicle equipped with autocannons and ATGMs.

BMPT has 70 - 80% better frontal protection than Namer 30.

1 Like

I assume it’s SPIKE dragging it up the BRs but the Namer real garbage compared to this while being 11.3, getting a bit questionable, especially with how RNG those missiles are

Probably, looks like they’ve done what they did with helis. Actual performance is irrelevant. FnF = X BR. no exceptions. Surprised the new Boxer is only 10.7 and not 11.7

Because the BMPT doesnt have FnF it can’t possibly be better. Obvious /s

Even if namer gets to 10.3 it will still have difficulties to kill mbts. Because the issue its the flight attack trajectory of the spike.

No sources, nothing, just a “please change this, I am dying too much” and it gets accepted lol.

12 Likes

No bias here

2 Likes

External belts…
WHICH DO NOT EVEN EXIST

What the fuck even


This is what they apparently consider not to be external btw, as destroying the belts here kills the vehicle 100% of the time (Unless ammo bug occurs)

Id love to see a soviet main play a non-soviet vehicle. It would re-define their definition of “unplayable”

5 Likes

Wtf they mean “accepted”, they better not remove the rare chance of shooting ammo actually doing anything

Soviet vehicle can be killed = major crisis, Gaijin holiday canceled. isntantly bug fixed

5 Likes

They’re making shit up now so the accountant is happy or something idk.
This thing unironically rivals the 8.3 PUMA, with the difference that there is a second one and that they cannot be disabled by shooting the turret as easily.

7 Likes

Yeah i don’t know about that one chief

4 Likes

I almost always see RU mains claiming their vehicles are awful, and defending American vehicles with a passion. “American bias!”

The worst I’ve said about Soviet vehicles is I hate the BMPs due to how ugly they are.

Most of my criticisms of Soviet tanks are usually still calling them good for their BR, but RU mains just hate their equipment.

1 Like

agreed this vehicle is extremely op with the mega armor and insane hull down capability at 10.3

2 Likes