Had a match yesterday it was 5 of us versus one bmpt left. We ganged up on him and of course i joined in. I was in a type 90 so i was already in a “superior” vehicle this guy had a bmpt as a backup.
We tracked him shot him everywhere and somehow he took little to no damage i kept hitting his engine…nothing…we barly had time to find his weak spots because he proceeded to basically one shot all of us and killed us all.
The problem isnt the gun its the magic survivability this thing has
I mean, that’s pretty easy to explain. PUMA VTJF and Namer are both quite overtiered, especially for how bad the Spikes are. This thing meanwhile is insanely undertiered.
Well, to point out something is OP you inherently have to defend the vehicle itself.
And RU mains refuse to defend their vehicles as a rule.
The fact I’m defending BMPT in order to support it moving up in BR due to it being OP is itself telling.
RU mains should praise their equipment, but they don’t.
Yet 10 tech tree players are defending the BMPT, and showcasing how it’s OP and needs to be moved up.
Especially when the hull is the only actual weakspot for it, and the hull is a T-72B equivalent hull, the best of any vehicle equipped with autocannons and ATGMs.
BMPT has 70 - 80% better frontal protection than Namer 30.
I assume it’s SPIKE dragging it up the BRs but the Namer real garbage compared to this while being 11.3, getting a bit questionable, especially with how RNG those missiles are
Probably, looks like they’ve done what they did with helis. Actual performance is irrelevant. FnF = X BR. no exceptions. Surprised the new Boxer is only 10.7 and not 11.7
Because the BMPT doesnt have FnF it can’t possibly be better. Obvious /s
They’re making shit up now so the accountant is happy or something idk.
This thing unironically rivals the 8.3 PUMA, with the difference that there is a second one and that they cannot be disabled by shooting the turret as easily.