dont care, everything i listed still technically wrong/not working/artificially nerfed for no reason.
1 Like
You cannot shut someone’s mouth because of the stats wtf
yeah and it also has literally nothing to do with all the issues and examples i pointed out.
its also super funny that you get censored when calling gaijin biased and then listing everything they do thats biased… and they actually wonder why people hate them XD
Oh, sorry for dropping stats as arguments when being called subhuman. How could I…
Can be 12.7 and still be good. They have to change volumetric
1 Like
All NATO stuff is nerfed-to-the-ground on purpose
Spike/MMP/JAGM/PARS missiles suck (their top-down approach is bugged). TOW-2B missiles don’t work (their damage model is broken). Bushmaster autocannons are not accurate enough, and their fire rate is too low. NATO MBT armors are literally paper. So many more things…
This game is heavily biased towards Russia
2 Likes
nice joke, NATO tanks have very good armor 3BM60 will often “hit” them, also they have way better post pen survivability than russian tanks
1 Like
I noticed throughout your different posts you always try to ragebait people, like this one :
https://forum.warthunder.com/t/move-the-bmpts-to-12-0/322879/22
I assume this one is another attempt
EDIT : before you answer, we also have this one : BMPT/72 BR Topic - #8518 by DankanXP311
1 Like
Only BMPT on a BMPT forum other than that I could care less about the rest. The only other issue is the SM-SV
And ? The T72B 1989 has the same UFP armour layout as the T90M so why would it pen the ufp of it.
Also the M1 has substantially better
- reload
- optics
- thermals
- reload
- massively better mobility
- turret traverse
- gun laying speeds.
The 3BM42 is a very strong round, which is effective even at higher BRs, which is why it’s about the only good thing the russian mbts have going for them outside of the UFP lol.
Hence my point if the M1 got m900 it would shoot up in BR.
You’re missing the point but it doesn’t matter.
what is your point lol, the abrams is objectively the better vehicle than most 10.7s bar possibly the 2A4 ,the 2a4 has the edge in penetration / damage while the abrams has reload and mobility.
Riot about what ?
Premium BMPT being nicely balanced at 11.7 ?
I’m gonna assume this is bait but please elaborate
How would you say it is nicely balanced at 11.7?
Premium one didn’t even perform that well at 11.3, so 11.7 looks like a nice spot to be fair.
Maybe if it’s damage model is fixed
In their current state, both BMPTs are able to dictate the outcome of a match single handedly due to their insane survivability
If it had the mobility of a Maus it wouldn’t be as much of an issue
The effect on winrates, even at 11.3 doesn’t lie, all it takes is a single hull down BMPT or two of them holding W, the opposing team collapses due to having to solely focus one/two players
Even at 12.7 they’d be a problem, clips in this thread showcase that
From January 13th till the end of March, the Premium BMPT went from a KPD of 1.41 to 1.27 and a W/R of 63.9% to 59.5%. Considering it outperformed nearly all 11.3 vehicles (beaten by 2 merkavas and the IPM1 by a small margin in KPD) with 1 million games in March alone (800-950k more than the listed 3 vehicles) I’d say it was still doing extremely well. Keep in mind it’s still holding a near 60% W/R with that many games.
2 Likes
Premium BMPT isn’t dictating anything with those stats.
That’s why they moved to 11.7 which is where premium one should comfortably sit at.
Keep in mind ~11.3 lineups are extremely scarce outside of USSR though.