issue with it, is that in this case it isnt a light tank, there is armor, spall liners and fuel tanks in the way, and its more likely you will end up ammoracking rather than crewkilling it, and yeah i wont deny having more crew its nice, but they are all so packed in together than it wont make much of a difference, if i side shoot the BMPT i will go for the ammo anyways and if it dosent kill it trough that its gonna cripple it anyways difference its minimal, specially when spall liners and fuel tanks do a lot of the job for survivability
i couldnt answer sooner cuz i was making myself breakfast
The reload on the M1 is fantastic.
The CR1 armour aint that great its good but not great.
The leopard 2A4 has worse armour sure but its mobility, firepwowr armour combo makes it better.
Cr1 has 4 reloads fast then with an aced crew its 6.5 seconds as well as a slow replenishment.
Literally has rhe best firepower as its sustained fire rate is so high.
Believe me ive thosuands of battles across M1s cr1s and leopards.
Like the CR1 as much as you want, ive days where i use only 10.7 britain, cause i do as well with them.
But i can still acknowledge the abrams and leo out shine it.
Plus 10.7 britains goated with good cas, good heli, great tanks, decent lights and ofc an okay spaa
the challenger mk3 armour is the best with NERA on the hull and the best hull down capability
not an issue if you play it well
best sustained firerate sure but on a 105 with not even 400mm of pen when the challenger 1 is sitting at almost 500mm
and as i said all have the ups and downs and yes. 10.7 britain is IN MY OPINION the best 10.7 lineup in game as the vickers exists along with the challengers and a T90? plus 2 decent ifv and great spaa (and the lynx is the best heli at the br im pretty sure)
Oh please 6 mavericks in 2026 when others sling KH38MTs, 16 Spices or Hammers are not competetive. Especially against a Pantsir SM SV.
Only major who does and they are missing it which was your question. Also its not like Sweden and Israel are doing very hot rn, Italy being the exception.
Same answer, russia has it, the others dont.
The Kinematics on the new missile are 100% fantasy bs if you look at speed, Gs and energy retention compared to everything else we have in game.
BMPT and to a certain degree fantasy damage model on all autoloader carousels but im not gonna count that since the T series is mid anyway. Still selective realism tho.
Again, russia has it (alongside double the amount of LMURs the MI28NM can carry) the others dont.
russia gets plenty of artificial bs to their benefit while Germany and the US have to cope with artificial bs to their negative like the turret baskets.
I dont disagree but that wasnt the question, the question was what theyre lacking and i dont see Gaijin removing any of the russian pamper stuff anytime soon.
So all in all what are Germany and the US lacking? Massive amounts of preferential treatment resulting in vastly lower playrate and winrate.
The turret and the side ERA they use is based on the prototype one in an older configuration that’s only been seen on a few hulls, my headcanon is that they did it for visibility to tell the two apart at a glance
Which also gives the rather funny possibility of there being another one added later with bag Relict and the “correct” (in terms of actual in service BMPT’s) turret