ha yes, APFSDS taking AoA after hitting NERA, an old time classic
1 Like
Lol I am playing mostly MK4B t90 is easy kill even T80 is harder to kill but bmpt… shot from side nothing, shot underbelly nothing, shot in driver hatch, nothing… shot random on 600m kill… like wtf? See I know when I shot T80 or T90 in some spot its just blow up, bmpt, burning in fire still managed to kill me frontally with 30mm gun, which is physically impossible heck even from side, there is literally 0.5m of steel equivalent
This can pen my side…
And this cannot??? like wtf
Whats this logic?
so uhhh, are they waiting russia to have 100% WR to fix bmpt??
1 Like
1 Like
And once again, I bring out this gem:
In other words, you had the opinion that the M2K was worse than the 29. And only after 10 other people insisted that it was not worse than the 29 AND you dueled someone in said matchup; you changed your moronic opinion.
You can now go and report the one and a bit year old post again, at which point I will go and edit it again to make it visible.
As for that moronic statement, we are not talking about ThunderSkill, we are talking about Statshark. We are also not talking about vehicle development, we are talking about the statistical performance of vehicles.
This is nothing but a strawman.
As for this strawman, you aren’t really showing anything, except that event or removed vehicles like the Maus, Panther 2, 10.5 Tiger and Coelian have higher than average statistics due to them being removed and generally only being played by experienced players. The F1 is a clubber and can be uptiered, same with the Ho-Ri and Chi-To. I have nothing against uptiering vehicles that perform better than average.
This is contradictory to you actual argument, as the BMPT is neither rare, nor an event vehicle, much rather it is a premium that is typically more likely to be played by newer players.
So I ask you once again:
How is it that the entire MBT line of russia at 11.3-12.0 sits at roughly 0.7-0.9 kills per spawn while the oh-so-bad BMPT has nearly twice as good stats?
3 Likes
@Grossaaaa
Nope, I had the opinion that Mirage 2000 was a better dogfighter with a better flight model for 1v1s/dogfights.
You didn’t include my entire quote:
“In acceleration, and at specific speeds relevant to air RB, Mirage 2000 is slightly worse.” is the full quote.
You intentionally left out the acceleration and specific speed part.
So prove that I am wrong about Mirage 2000 being a better dogfighter.
You can’t, cause you know I am right.
Again, stats are different player groups. Different player groups have different skill levels. This understanding is taught to you in Statistics courses.
So yeah, enjoy thinking Mig-29 is superior to Mirage 2000 in dogfights, Grossaa.
I’ll prove you wrong like I proved people wrong back then.
so u say bmpt is good because good players use it?
You forgot to edit this post:
Man, this is a forum, not a gaslighting competition. You know that people can use sites like wayback machine to see that you edited your posts, right?
These are, once again averages. Since you seem to have trouble understanding the meaning of the word average, here is a link for you that should explain it: Average - Wikipedia
Or, if you have trouble clicking the blue marked letters, here is the summary of said article:
In mathematics, an average of a collection or group is a value that is most central, common, or typical in some sense, and represents its overall position. In mathematics, it most commonly refers to the arithmetic mean, but may also refer to other measures such as other types of mean or the mode.
I would like you to explain, once again, why the acorrding to you better T80U has worse average statistics across the board than the BMPT.
1 Like