Not addressed would mean they never acknowledged them at all.
They have in fact stated its.passed to devs.
Its a low priority fix, especially considering the amount of broken stuff anx i mean non functioning stuff added of late it shows why.
It done in with my 2a6 when I’ve tested it about 14 times out of the 20 so we tried it.
So its too frquently to he the ricochete
No. A bug is addressed when it’s fixed. Not acknowledged, not triaged, not put into the backlog, not when it’s put into a sprint, not when it’s become the subject of a pull request, not when it’s under testing but when it’s fixed. A debate can be had whether it’s fixed before or after release but simply saying something has been acknowledged and then claiming that means it’s addressed is absurd.
Do you have the bug report?
As a Soviet main, f*ck this tank, still.
Abhorrently modelled, needs to be deleted and reworked from the ground up. I’m lolpenning Leo 2A4’s UFP with Mango whilst this thing shrugs off rounds for fun. It’s not fun having them on your team, it’s not fun fighting against them.
Fair and balanced huh gaijin. 11/16 enemies in a 1 cap map with nothing but hills all in terminators to hull down in. Whoever decided to add the terminator needs to be fired. Congrats on killing 10.3-11.3.
Thank God for the new event but once it’s over I’m hoping they remove this BS tank already.
This has still made me not want to play any GRB since I’m a top tier enjoyer
10.3 vehicles should not see BMPTs ever, yet this thing still sits at 11.3. Causing an uptier black hole, 5 months and everyone hates it, yet still no communication.
This is the state of the game now, all the fun is stripped away and power creep premiums are the new norm, so buy them or go fuck yourself.
And i rather choose to go fuck myself and stop giving any money to gaijin.
I would advice everyone to stop buying anything from them, until they actually do something for us.
The Average K/S of a BMPT player is 1.6/1.3 kills per spawn.
The average kills per spawn in GRB across all BRs is 0.73. This thing, even the premium version that usually has worse than average stats, performs twice as well when driven by the average player.
Here are some stats of “”““contemporary””“” IFVs:
Most are not even close to going 1:1 with their kill to spawn ratio. However the BMPT is fine at the same BR despite performing nearly twice as good as most other IFVs?
I wish my tank could survive ammo detonations regularly and with no ill effects.
How is this allowed to continue? It’s ridiculous.
Hey now, where is my CRV boxer block II?
I give up, fighting an onslaught of BMPTs every single match has just sucked the fun out of this game. Kill one and there’s 4 more behind it that steamroll over you anyways. Such a joyous moment to watch a BMPT eat a DM53 round, generate no spall, and then kill your barrel and then creep up and kill you with ease using its 30mm gun (that somehow rips through armor while the 30mm bushmaster tickles enemies at best).
Still remains an insult that gaijins greed has allowed these tanks to stay as they are. They ignore feedback and “look at stats” and then watch as the BMPT has skyrocketed up to the top and just let it remain there ruining everything between 10.3-13.0.
Maybe at some point they’ll just move Russia into its own bracket at these BRs so all the other nations can go back to enjoying the game.
gg gayjin yoiu re destroy more the game then he was russian are too mutch powerfull all fun is over RUSSIAN ARE ALWAY S TOP TIER I PLAYU 10.3 I AM ALWAY WITH CANCER BMPT JUST PUT IT IN 12.0 RUSSIAN HAVE ENOUGHT CHEAT
At 10.3 I have to face Soviet tanks that are far more powerful than BMPT: T-90A, T-72B3 Arena, T-72B3…
Every time I play 11.3/11.7 I slaughter BMPTs because the MBTs there are vastly superior to it.
Every time I play 10.3, especially USA as it’s stronger than German 10.7, I frag BMPTs easier than T-90A players because the BMPTs weapons are worse than T-90A’s.
There’s a question to be asked as well…
Why would I ever play an 11.7 BMPT when superior tanks are at 11.3 and 11.7: T-80U, T-80UK, T-90A, T-72B3…
Why would I harm the chances of my team winning by bringing a vehicle that is worse than T-80U?
T-80U has 600mm of kinetic penetration at 60 degrees.
BMPT has 60mm, but 80mm flat I guess… in those rare instances.
BMPT also has 800mm metal slug penetration ATGMs, which cannot pen the same armor that 3BM46 can, and the ATGMs are not as accurately fired in close range due to offset.
the 2a5 wan not added with this armor in live server this is dev server on live server the armor nerfed undergound frontal armor to 350mm protection no 700mm 9.0 tanks epentrate leopard frontal armor … so dont compare leopard with bmpt…
so u get ammor racked? no ammo lose and u capable to fire?:D
so my opinion need to ad apfsds capable to fire with two gun no implement the bouncin barrel with hight firerate and put again in 10.7
Sorry what? the T90A, T72B3 and Arena are not better than the BMPT.
It’s damage model is still broken.
It has better overall mobility than arena and T90A last I chekced as it’s lighter.
Has far more match effect especially hulldown as you cannot kill it only damage it.
Has higher firepower as well due to the fact it can send a constant stream of rounds ut as well as four kornets.
Where did you pull 600mm of kinetic penetration at 60 degrees on the T80U ?? the 3BM46 has at 60 degrees and 10 meters 308MM of pen.
No where near 600 mate.
No tank in teh game has 600MM of kinetic penetration at 60 degrees even teh Obj 252
The 800MM of penetation tandem missiles which bypass ERA and such?
Which also can overpressure?
also at close range the auto cannons are more than sufficient to pepper people apart.
BMPT’s damage model is a T-90 with more space between the UFP and ERA packages.
If BMPT is hull down, you’re on a map with dozens of flanking routes.
BMPT has vastly inferior firepower to T-80U.
308 steel plate [not penetration] /cos 2 = 616mm of penetration.
