the minimum we can do is ask to remove ammo box.
It plays better with the box. Too easy to lose all missiles to damage and they aren’t very good in the first place plus issues with huge parallax. That would be unfair and not fun.
Right now the vehicle is already withing game criteria of balance statistics wise its literally fixed.
** BMPT-72: Relikt ERA HHRHA side plates: 11 → 12 mm*
They are reading this post and trolling us
Just like playing against the BMPT is?
Right now the vehicle is already withing game criteria of balance statistics wise its literally fixed.
You only play Russia. You’ve no stounding to call this thing “balanced”.
You mean when they moved everything up all at once in the br changes that effected every nation? T80ue1 got moved to 12.0, leopard 2a4m got moved to 12.0, lots of things got moved to 12.0. Your point is invalid.
I have the same standing to conclude as anyone else though? It wasn’t me who makes the statistics.
Imagine complaining about bmpt 57% when this is the norm:
Btw i have lorraine setups and ibcan confirm this easy gameplay
You missed my point. UE1 and 2A4M are not equals to the M1A1 HC (+), they are far worse. M1A1 HC Spec vehicles are 12.7s at 12.0. They are undertiered.
And yet arguably ue1 is the best soviet tank in the game(maaaaaybe).
Deflection, nice.
I have the same standing to conclude as anyone else though?
Yea no, you don’t.
Eh. It would be better than BVM if it:
Had a good vertical traverse
Didn’t constantly get UFP’d by rounds with more than 600mm of pen
Would you say BMPT is OP? Just asking.
I just did.
Fact isn’t deflection.
Incorrectly interpreted stats arent facts tho.
Yes that’s why you can’t complain about 57 bmpt when french japanese tech trees exist.
You could with 65 but not with 57 anymore
I suspect it will go down to the low 50s when March stats come out.
1 Like
Yes you can, because youre comparing low to mid tier niche played vehicles and tech trees to the second most popular vehicle in the 10.3-11.7 bracket
Again first you need to understand that war thunder is played individually.
A player is not responsible for actions of other players. 57 in russian tree are equal to 57 in french tree and shoul b| treated as such when you play 10v10 or 1v1.
You dont play war thinder 200 vs 10 based on matchmaking population.
1 Like
to be honest, for me the bmpt really ruined the fun i had in top tier, i loved playing in 12.7 to 10.7 with my Italian lineups, but ever since the addition of the bmpt is just couldnt really have fun since as much as i love the Ariete…they are my favourite tank, they stand no chance against the bmpt in my experience IF my barrel doesnt get shreded or my ammo doesnt explode i can kill them most of the time but it really is easy to kill the Ariete from the front with a BMPT and most of the time i have no time to react to them, the same goes with the Centauro 120, i can kill them if flank them (thoe there were plenty of times where i shot their side and my apfsds did nothing but that was said countelss of times in the forum post so its nothing new), the Otomatic stands zero chance because of the big ahh forhead and the KF 41 is just no match for the bmpt since yet again the KF 41 is a big IFV…
do take this with a HUGE grain of salt, im just an average player at best and play to have fun so this might just be skill issue, i just wanted to quickly type this out
bro are they going to nerf BMPT anytime soon ffs
I’ve been avoiding playing 10.7+ just because of BMPT alone and Gaijin has been doing jack shit after moving it to 11.3 (still too low) weeks ago
holy fucking russian bias
Russian tank are pathetic irl but yea ofc its unkillable in game
they arent getting a cent from me from now on fuck this company
ive been getting free premium by grinding events and selling them for gaijin coins and I rarely ever use my own money, and now im never spending a dime on this shit game again
1 Like
No its not but i feel like trying to explain to you why sample size matters especially in video games would be a complete and utter waste of time so im just gonna let it be. Maybe someone with more patience can explain to you why comparing stats in wildly different BRs with wildy different sample sizes is nonsensical