Israeli tanks are more comfortable than US tanks. Israeli tanks have LWS and APS.
dont worry, even if the ammo exploded the tank would be fine
and would still be able to shoot you
1 Like
True autocannons take a lot of time to destroy the ERA and then doing actual damage. Time enough for bmpt to turn away.
Even so, just flank arguments are trash arguments, a n asu57 can pen an abrams from the side, do they deserve to be at the same br?
5 Likes
Yeah I already know ,can we not. I agree it need to move up or just get it armoured artificially nerfed or something Something need to be done anyway , just depend on when Gaijin will do it
Not that useful when your armor eat a sabot round like a hot knife to butter.
A very good feature its that hve good depression when aiming back, not like abrams or leopard.
Best way I found out is the weakspot in the front , if not shoot from the back. The spall liner one this thing basically guarantee that you will not kill this thing even if penning from the side. I don’t think I have killed the thing with a ammo rack ever
I noticed more players learn to kill me fast in the last few matches yesterday. I do think a lot of people mistake the grenade launcher ammo going off for my “ammorack” and stop shooting, which was weird lol. I’m more surprised the WT reddit has had more balanced takes on this in the comments compared to the usual ‘bias’ posts.
1 Like
What is there to be said other than it needs to be raised in BR significantly?
Already said my part in this in the polls and other thread, I like the vehicle and would spam it regardless. Move it up and give it APFSDS? fine by me. Just don’t have double standards on other vehicles while saying it (they know who they are).
1 Like
Some of the take aren’t that bad. I do agree with a lot of them but jesus they keep yapping on and on about the armor and back to russian biased this russian biased that. It is like their first time seeing Gaijin did questionable BR placement.
Literally reason why a lot of vehicle still undertier or overtier till this day. You aint matter unless you are the big three Johnny.
3 Likes
Spot on pretty much, its wild to see people defend the T58/XM246 or want the M1 Abrams back at 10.3, you can look at my stats in it, the Abrams isn’t even done spading but I have a 3.84 KD + 77% WR in it. We can point broken vehicles anywhere, the ‘bias’ being the only explanation always is tiring at this point.
2 Likes
The team has already made multiple mistakes if they let T-90Ms and T-80BVMs do that though.
Like that is like a dream target practice for nations like US, Germany, France, Sweden and Italy. Russian MBTs are pretty easy to fight for these nations, Russian top tiwr only becomes problematic when they spawn CAS.
Of course a nation seems to be the worst to someone who is just mediocre. (Not talking about you here obviously)
Ah yes you concluded that all Israeli tanks are more comfortable based on the experience of 30 battles in the Magach 6B Gal and 8 games in the Merkava Mk.2D?
US > Israel and it really isn’t even close at the majoritt of the BRs, except maybe 9.3 and 10.0 which are pretty great for Israel.
3 Likes
Ayo chill
1 Like
I think that due to the still powerful armor of bmpt in 12.7, increasing the weight is not enough to balance it out. I believe it would be more reasonable to restore the missile frame/grenade launcher and 30mm chain that explode at the slightest touch in the test server and retain the weight of 10.3.
1 Like
Yeah I didn’t take it that way dw, but it did make me chuckle a bit the other day checking the stats of two people and they had terrible stats in the Falcon of all things.
1 Like
Gaijin deliberately buffs the USSR. Pay attention: the entire game from BR 9.3 is balanced around the USSR. At 10.3 they have four tanks that significantly outperform the rest. For example, the penetration of shells from the TURMS or the T-80UD is about 450 mm, while the US M1 KVT (10.7) has only 370 mm. The Leopard 2A4 (10.7) with DM23 has around 400 mm. I understand that they are Russian and want to see their nation stronger, but not in such a blatant way, right?
Let’s not forget to mention that on top of strong shells, they also give their tanks very good armor. On my M1 KVT, I can’t penetrate that BMPT-72 at all, while it can penetrate me from any angle. I won’t even mention that playing at 9.3 has become impossible — I’m always matched against 10.3 USSR.
5 Likes
This really got flagged as spam?
Sigh, the reason people are taking these complaints less seriously is because people keep claiming ridiculous things. The M1 Abrams (the tech tree KVT) is already more than fine where it is, its my highest performing stock grind (bar the T26E5) yet. And I regularly see people get nukes with it without just being a sneaky flanker.
4 Likes
Well no, lol. I know you like to try and trap people into gotchas and you do love your whataboutisms but I’m going to have to disappoint you.
The t-58 in particular is fundamentally almost impossible to balance, it’s practically a rolling contradiction.
Mediocre mobility, no stabiliser, no thermals, no laser range finder (thank god), a reliance on chemical rounds (no one is penetrating hardly anything with the aphe round) and armour that can be a bit trolly but isn’t really an issue for the things it faces.
What holds it down in br is obvious, just as what pushes it up (the gun and autoloader) is obvious. It’s stuck just like the maus and should probably have never been added.
The turm3? I don’t really have any issues with it. The only things it has going for it are the fire rate and coaxial auto cannon.
The bmpt is none of these things.
Excellent thermals, extremely strong top tier level protection, very high multi-channel firepower, good mobility for its weight and an absurdly forgiving damage model.
The correct solution is obvious: add the darts it should have and push it up to 11.7 to sit with the premium t-80. The single reason for its br placement is the ammunition which is a conscious decision by gaijin to keep it at 10.3 where its protection just isn’t appropriate for the br.
6 Likes
Got flagged as inappropriate now