BMPT/72 BR Topic

BMPT need go up to 14.7

I changed my mind, it has to be removed from the game.

8 Likes

Should’ve never been added to the game in the first place.

They did this so they can just find an excuse to add T-14/15 platforms in the future…

3 Likes

Will it be the actual Armata, or GJNs fever dream of the Armata though?

3 Likes

T14 TT and T15 Moderna will be pack premium :)

1 Like

Considering how much Russian platforms overperforms in terms of protection and survivability it will become pretty much wet dream.

Tho at the same time it will be breach repair simulator due to basically not having any armor on turret.

7 Likes

Don’t worry, 70% of the shots taken at the turret will ricochet in the most magical way
infact, there’s a 10% chance it will reflect the shell back to you and you’ll die to your own shot

8 Likes

Now its wrecking 13.0… might have to buff some MBT damage models.

First thing that comes to my mind is the Abram’s turret ring.

2 Likes

I’m sure Abrams neck being modeled after used paper towels has to be correct, maybe. BMPT should clear blitz straight through it.

3 Likes

Hellfire’s are missing overpressure. Same with Apache 30mm against thin skinned vehicles and infantry.

2 Likes

It will the ultimate BS propaganda wagon with nukes launchers instead of smoke, automatic drones and sharks with fricking laser beams.

2 Likes

after a lot more games of top tier and occasionally 10.7 to grind the booge-i mean, Booker, i still struggle a bit against bmpts cuz theres no barrel to snipe as they will just spray me with 30mm if one gun goes down anyways and lfp can be a bit trolly sometimes. so i just fly a helicopter send em a nice hellfire and get shot down by the same guy in a sukhoi or the free pantsir or something lol.

1 Like

also i cant wait to grind the regular M1A1 hc once i get it…at least the dozer blade looks cool

Yeah, I have done this since the Eliminator came out. I refuse all games that are in its BR range. Admittedly that doesn’t effect many of my vehicles as I play most below that. But when it happens, I return to hanger.

1 Like

We couldn’t call it bias because the BMPT arrived, this has been a thing with the BMP-2s or vehicles witht he 2a42 cannon since the beginning of time. Sine autocannons got introduced actually.

We also can’t just apply the nerf to 1 vehicle or weapon because this would have to be a universal change.

I’m not sure what this means entirely. As far as I know, if more vehicles with tank hulls
and auto combinations come out. There is no flat out “careful implementation” because it’s a vehicle that combines the annoyances of an autocannon stacked on a tank chassis. There is no true way to “carefully” implement that. Even if we were to say the armor on the vehicle wasn’t “funky” to begin with.

You mean prove the 2a42 cannon at distance.
This video should suffice enough.

Also this video should suffice to compared to western counterparts on slower rates of fire mind you.

I understand because of the BMPT, everyone wants to see the 2a42 cannon get it’s “real spread” but I’m trying to also add this isn’t just weapon speific, this would have to be a universal change for all existing autocannons in the game.

I know someones gonna claim “oh but you’re nerfing nato vehicles again” when it’s just keeping the realism everyone asks for consistent across the game

Sure, sounds good, kinda stupid that every gun is held to the exact same standards, which buffs some and nerfs others (by negating the advantage they are meant to have) but it also needs to be done for me things too, like ammo belts being counted as internal vs external, how ERA is modeled, ATGMs being fired on the move, etc etc there is a reason why “Selective Realism” has been a term used a lot since the BMPT was added

9 Likes

A good example I could bring up is that if you knick the Pantsirs 30mm ammo belt by a pixel on the “external” part leading to the guns themselves, it just magically blows up, even if you’re carrying a mostly AP belt. That isn’t very realistic, I don’t here any claiming about bias on that.

But somebody is gonna say, “oh it’s fine beause it’s pretty strong anyways” Sure… I guess?

or that light tanks, especially the large SPAAs like the Pantsir (but others too) have so much empty space that they can be annoying to kill. So actually have a bit of a vulnerability like that does help off-set that. I think my record was a FlakRad needing 4 APFSDS rounds, no idea why it took so many.

2 Likes