Or you know, the fact that all those tanks get turned inside out to pretty much all KE ammo in their bracket while the BMPT can absorb more damage than the T-90M without any issue
1 Like
You’re quoting the wrong person. You don’t need to tell me about the BMPT BS. It’s way beyond imaginable limits.
This vehicle continues to ruin matches. It still randomly takes hits to the sides (almost none) – it has five crew members… five Carl, hit -3 sides, two survived. I can’t understand at all how, when a tank’s barrel is hit, it loses the ability to fire. Why does the BMPT’s turret traverse mechanism and barrels remain functional even when hit under the turret barrel?
Do not reply to me again if you are going to ignore the rest of the statement. The only td that get scouting are vehicles on what most would call light tank/tankette chassis, or possibly some of the open box style td. The only examples that come to mind would be the ASU’s.
It’s even crazier that even without APFSDS, the BMPT is way more efficient at crippling tanks than most of those
“Do not reply to me again” if you are going to be rude, condescending, or dismissive. I was not rude, condescending or dismissive towards you. You just reacted with unwarranted attitude.
All of those tanks listed above have very low RoF APFSDS, just imagine the outrage if the Puma could fire its AP rounds at 600 RPM. Zenturion made a video about it, the difference is night and day. The BMPT APDS only works because of the high RPM.
well, besides the BMP-2M and the AJAX, tho the AJAX tends to die to a BMPT before i see any
That and the APDS isn’t even that bad pen wise, the APDS does allow you to pen some weakpoints even in the front, stuff like the Type 90 especially is really bad against it since it can pen like 3 different areas in the front, so it wouldn’t even need to disable the barrel and tracks depending on how quick they are
I think the desert warrior has a 25mm bushmaster with like 90mm pen APFSDS, slightly worse than that APDS but the fire-rate def makes a massive difference there, and i think it’s 10.0
Wonder how the hell they thought those 2 were only a 0.3 BR difference when it first got added
…wrong thread…
wrong thread?
This has got to be one of the worst takes on this forum. U ragebaiting bro?
You literally ignored part of what i said to make it seem like you knew what was going on?
Yeah lol
The shot was clean through, there was no other object interaction between firing and connection. And I wouldn’t say equally, this easily happens more against T series tanks than anything else, VT4 being behind it.
No, it reacts differently in that we’ve been shooting weak spots of this hull for what feels like eons but now darts are just straight up getting lost in the sauce upon arrival. I wish you wouldn’t use the protection analysis as a baseline either, it’s insanely unreliable, it tells you all types of shots that will pen a tank that are simply not happening. You use the hit analysis as your example and then follow up with accuracy, I can only assume you were at a safe engaging distance and not the primary target, using the more reliably 75mm, you could gib almost any other nations tank shooting them anywhere but we have to pixel perfect shoot RU tanks for effectiveness and that’s somehow balanced yeh? A good example would be the T-series tanks as it says you can pen under the angled faceplates and hit the crew and breach and the shot never seems to go through unless you’re more than 1100m away, I say this in situations with all the T series covered in bushes when you need to identify the series of tank and remember exactly where the viewport is in a split second when you play a nation that 90% dies in one shot anyone from the front.
I’ve also lost absolute trust in the hit analysis credibility, one of my shots eaten by the infamous T-series phantom trunnion was displayed as having gone through the tank, damaging modules, and passing through a crew members face doing no damage.
It wouldn’t matter, Abrams armour is made out of aluminum in this game, these two vehicles wouldn’t have the same devastating experience, the HTSVL is mostly annoying because of it’s low profile, I’d honestly wager giving it a bigger profile would lower its effectiveness all around, and it’d still only have 1 cannon to deal with.
Only one of these vehicles has a comparable RoF, and it’s also RU lmao, the only real balancing factor the BMPT has is the fact it doesn’t have APFSDS.
I assure you you’re not, this happens so much it irritates me because hulled down I can’t do anything besides trying to barrel/breach, which too often results in this or “Non-pen”,
them while I risk being one shot through all of my front, face and lower and this same situation happens time and time again, trunnion eats my round and I get breached/barreled/crew killed/detonation/turret ring/my old high school yearbook, all decimated. Or the fact that their carousel is often absent of any rounds or charges, how you hit it and strike no rounds is baffling.
1 Like
i dont know why but i think the ammo of the new nerf is broken and need fixes.
here a video where he kept shooting but not ammo was shown in the damage screen
3 Likes
I have this issue too lol all the t-series currently has some vibranium plates hidden around the breech area, a lot of angles the DM53/M829A2 will simply bounce off, so it’s a hit and miss when one decided to push you without exposing a section of their hull.
3 Likes
Meanwhile the “Most armoured” MBT in the game has the most fragile breach I’ve ever experienced, and I painstakingly went up the entire Chieftain/Challenger line because faction loyalty, then settled on JP as my main because RoF and mobility. I simply can’t with the STRVs, breach/turret ring, repair for 29 seconds, die 2 seconds before finishing.
My GR.1 was considered the most OP vehicle the game had ever seen at the time (We’re ignoring the Is-6 here) and it was turned into fodder less than 2 weeks later when it had to fight everything that had flares. Feels like they could’ve just fixed the issue of SRAAMS flying off the rail at 130 degree angles as an alternative… Or how the Type 89 was considered OP and they removed the ability to fire on the move from the ATGMs for balance and I suppose real life capabilities, but we only get real life drawbacks included selectively.
1 Like