Than maybe if gaijin put’s it at 12.0 people will stop complaining.
Also this vehicle isn’t the first of it’s kind, the Namer technically did come first.
The T90 is far easier to deal with, my 10.7 IFVs can deal with T90s, BMPT is a different literal beats.
11.3 doesn’t change anything, it needs a nerf in its model
Even at 16.7, it would perform the same
1 Like
You don’t even know what 16.7 would contain lmao, take it down a notch.
Now you’re just over-exaggerating
Perception, the model is literally the same except for crew layout.
look at the namer now
Namer is the punchline of a joke, and has to expose it’s ammo box in order to even engage anything lmao.
1 Like
But nobody was asking for that ammo box to evaporate the entire tank now were they?
But people want atgms to evaporate the tank chassis. Yep, yep.
It can resist a railgun shot, maybe even nuclear bomb
Are you going to bring some form of logic and thinking to the table instead of exaggerations.
I imagine it didn’t matter much because if you barrel it that’s a wrap, it couldn’t simply swap to a secondary barrel.
You swap out the BMPTS turret with the T-90s, it’s the same vehicle, only difference is that turret is larger and has the usual weakspots of any Russian tank.
Strv122s don’t suffer from this none at all, I’d say they are better armored than the T-90 from a frontal profile or equally as such, especially hull down.
Yes : I’m getting nuked every 3 games against 11.3 GRB Russia, I don’t understand why
2 Likes
Speaking of such.
Zenutrion released soem video of someone requesting the Puma too get it’s emergency mode 600rpm.
“To counter the bmpt”. And then people in the comments claiming bias if it’s rejected. But they keyword here was “emergency” not standard.
It’s like the Mig-21s afterburner situation, people complaining it had it’s emergency mode thrust, which was limited. Hence the “emergency” and it got taken away for a normal stage burner.
1 Like
holy cope the game have evrything that russia does and still loses.
what a joke
1 Like
As much as the devs pull selective realism and double-standards, the playerbase is no better for it. Requesting changes without looking at the bigger picture.
T90s still far easier to deal with due to the lack of the 2 additional crew and the extra 800 fuel tanks to make rounds go wonky on touch.
I think the main thing here is that T-90s fuel tanks are closer to the ammo then the BMPTS (if I recall correctly)
The 2s38 and T-90 ger merked just from a fuel explosion, so that’s also a factor.
The TT BMPT GL rounds sit right up against 2 fuel tanks, and majority of the cookoffs people are seeing is those GL rounds being ignited, those same fuel tanks sit directly above the Power system for the FCS, Stab, and oddly enough the radar system. Why is the power system not damaged from that detonation allowing BMPTs to keep cruising around flames ablaze firing.
Unless we get a view of the internals, it wouldn’t be far fetched to assume that engineers when designing the BMPT new of this risk and that entire setion self contained to not detonate into the compartment and cause external damage.
The X-ray view doesn’t do full justice for interior modules as everything appears “open”