It gave you that UNO reverse card there lol
jokes aside just shoot the hull
2 Likes
You clearly haven’t played the Ajax if you think it’s better than the BMPT. It’s massive and has no armour. The moment a BMPT sees you, you are dead. Meanwhile, you have to react in a split second to shoot that tiny, thin weakspot on the BMPT front, maybe doing superficial damage and you’re still dead. Side on? You can’t even damage the BMPT side-on in the Ajax. What are you talking about?!
1 Like
I disagree
50mm front plate. Just like space between hull and turret of Abrams, but bigger and slower.
I agree that BMPT should be at 11.0, but only because right now it can face 9.3 💀
?
Not sure what posting (what I assume are) my stats has anything to do with the conversation TBH, it just makes you look a bit of an idiot and out of arguments but you do you I guess.
Im guessing that the point you were trying to make was that other stuff is inaccurate so that makes it ok? It’s kinda hard to figure out what point you’re trying to make as you’re all over the place and not very coherent.
If that is your point, other guns have their accuracy modelled. The 17pdr apds for example. Other stuff being wrong doesn’t excuse the bmpt - two wrongs don’t make a right after all.
It’s like taking a Churchill tank, removing the armour and making it fast. That’s ok as other stuff is wrong too seems to be the argument you’re making
BMPT is even more massive than Ajax tho and rushing the enemies in the BMPT like you described is prob the most effective tactics it got to play somewhat good. Otherwise it gets one tap by basically anyone that knows where to shoot it on the turret.
1 Like
Ok habibi what do you want me to do ? I only checked the vehicle you play , not your stats. Which they are under average LMAO. Bro should clam up if bro can’t even bother to read what other people said before spawning in an entire abomination and hoping I will read all dat
1 Like
Are you ok? You don’t seem ok.
You do realise that I was responding to you saying I only play a single nation right?
You seem unreasonably angry someone proved you wrong, you should work on that.
Oh right, you’re channeling those “Post-Truth” vibes. Just because you believe it to be untrue, it doesn’t make it so. Check the protection analysis.
What is this troll nonsense? By Gaijin’s logic, if more UK mains were bad, their tanks would have far more favourable BR’s. Instead they’re always a massive disappointment. Ajax included.
depends on playstyle i guess
I doubt your differing playstyle lessens the armour on a BMPT to the point where you can kill one in an Ajax.
That’s a lot of words to say you have nothing to add.
Did you have an actual point about the bmpt? If so, make it rather than going on unhinged rants.
When you’re ready to actually have a discussion, let me know.
You clearly didn’t understand what I wrote, and don’t know what sarcasm is. I littleraly said that the balancing team “thinks” that those tanks mentions are the same or better than the BMPT because they are the same br or higher brs even though everyone knows that it shouldn’t be like that.
Illiterate.
He’s just mad and lashing out. I suspect he’s yet to learn emotional regulation. Common in kids before the prefrontal cortex fully develops.
1 Like
If that was sarcasm, and I can see now that it was then I apologise and agree with you. There’s so much preposterous nonsense spewed in the defence of overpowered Russian vehicles that it’s hard to know sometimes.
1 Like
Namers are 11.3 with arguably worse armament.
1 Like
Well everytime they gave Britain something new and good it jumps up several BRs because Ruskis like you cry about it.
Fox somehow being 8.0 for one.
8 Likes
Ah yes, victim blaming. Have you considered consulting a psychiatrist? I think you have some problems.
5 Likes