Spikes fails against any MBT, sometimes better kill chance against T-series
1 Like
i hit one with 2 spikes and both time i destroyed 1 ERA plate… ONE single turned black…
remind me again what tanden warhead means?
4 Likes
ahhh yes the quantum soviet technology. It’s like Schrödinger’s cat…is the crew there or not? The dart piercing the spall liner, damaging the track on the opposite side, but the crew unscathed.
@SilentTracker …can we get the ability to select modifications, and view from xray when using protection analysis? @Smin1080p_WT please? 🍒
5 Likes
oh yeah and russian mains will scream your having a skill issue and that there isnt russian bias you just have bias against russian stuff (case endpoint any discussion on the KH38s before the introduction of the new sams and this thread lmao)
5 Likes
ERA is a GO!!! 😈
Statistics before ERA Upgrade:
Without air kills:
K/D = 2.42
K/S = 1.81
With air kills:
K/D = 2.83
K/S = 2.13
3 Likes
2 Likes
Quick nitpick correction, the BMPT (and M1128 MGS/Expeditionary Tank) is a overhead/low profile turret (crew inside turret but weapon systems above their heads, crew rotates with weapons and turret). Proper unmanned turrets are on the PUMA and VBCI MCT30 (nobody rotating with the turret or weapon systems)
If Gaijin goes and drops the T-14 they also have no excuse to also give NATO the comparable vehicles they produced anyway. Say hello to KF51-U, Leo A-RC 3.0 and M1 TTB. Probably more I can’t remember rn.
1 Like
Damn, that spall liner must be working with 1000% efficency
shell dissapeared after hitting the stalinium kneecap of the crew member
5 Likes
sigh if only NATO MBTs had their spall liners work like this.
5 Likes
I mean, I agree the BMPT’s damage model can be funky, but failing to kill it after seven(!) APFSDS rounds to the side is simply a Skill Issue™.
11 Likes
I almost thought that was a marker for a second lol.
Spoiler
ALTMAN BE PRAISED!
They will blame you for telling him where to shot.
Cant help people these days
Honestly it’s getting to the point where another review bombing campaign might be the only solution for a proper review of trying to fix things at the moment.
8 Likes
Don’t know if it’s been posted before but this video goes into some of the more egregious issues.
If I were making changes to the bmpt’s, I’d nerf their ERA, link the belt feeding the cannons to the belt in the hull (or treat the belt feeding the cannons as a ready rack), and make missile detonation disable the turret. It’d also get a new br of at least 11.3 or so.
7 Likes
Cant wait to see what the devs first things are when they are coming back this week
I think BMPT situation is so bad they should do post how they’re going to handle this and how they’re going to work that in future we don’t end up in similar situation with other vehicle that pretty much ruins whole range of BR.
What I fear is that devs will just stand their ground and say they have done nothing wrong and say they will change the BR when they see it is needed.
5 Likes
“Works as intended”
“We think the belts not being internal is a clear marketing lie”
“Puma IFV will never be fixed to be a proper competitor”
“The vehicle will receive fixes as it having a K/D ratio means it can actually die, which we have been told by Putin himself just isn’t possible!”
…
4 Likes
It is a pretty easy debate to argue the BMP-T is superior to the Namer T-shrex or whatever it is, and the PUMA VJTF, which are both above it in BR.
The BMP-T has no business fighting anything below 10.7.
Meanwhile, in naval, another Russian Coastal is ruining the mode (as much as you can do) - the AK-225 from own experience is just easy mode. The hard part is not accidentally jamming your own guns lol.
4 Likes
Gaijin:
We have decided to buff soviet ERA as it wasn’t performing correctly, We have given the BMPT APDSFS and upgraded ATGMs and decided to revert our recent BR change for it
5 Likes
Yup. BMPT should be placed at a BR where the only tanks it faces have appropriate shells. 12.0 should do it
3 Likes