At close range it’s only really effective against R-60s and similarly week seeker missiles, close range is advised for IR missiles against non-afterburning targets.
But this topic is about BMPT needing to be a higher BR.
as usual you brought it up. As usual you lie.
1 Like
Yeah uhhh my Spyder doesn’t do that :) even when thrown from 15km.
There’s a reason I’ve been calling Spyder 12.0 equivalent for a bit.
Awww, I guess I haven’t got much to say then.
1 Like
Oh God, forbid Russia having one decent top MBT.
God forbid a single soviet vehicle being balanced. After the recent buffs, half of them are notably under BRed
5 Likes
Also just too many additions and buffs in a rather short time frame (for WT…).
KH-38, LMUR, Soyuz, Flanker, R77-1, BMPT, caroussel reload buff, really good event reward (Foxbat ^^), naval missile age, super special BUK complex, DIRCM.
They should really make break. Whats next? MIR space station with laser lances for orbital strikes?
2 Likes
Im guessing they’ll get the best ARMs, their radars will be immune to our ARMs and they’ll be the first to get MMW
Yep. I glad t series became more balanced than it was before
1 Like
Hopefully they’ll all get BR increases
Wonderful TANDEM warhead doing TANDEM things :)
ah comrade, they aren’t missing, they are simply “optional”, no need to add them, yes
(they’ll add them in the future as a different vehicle that you need to research)
3 Likes
7 Likes
“balancing mechanic”
(I am actually convinced at this point that they ignore reports if they think it might cause balance issues)
4 Likes
Average Sabot behaviour against russian tanks.
3 Likes
typical russian fuel tank eating a shell
2 Likes
do we have the same round ? stupid volumetrics from gaijin
1 Like
the BMP-2M with that KD really adding to how stupid they were being the same BR
4 Likes