46! This number only goes up…
2 Likes
There are only 3 options in this game
- Play Russia (and make it invincible in a virtual world)
- Pay money
- Quit
6 Likes
💯
as to why was it added? greed
i wonder how many hundreds of thousands this thing made
7 Likes
The devs love ruining the game and all the br’s around the terminator and it takes them this long to realize the thing needs to be higher or nerfed to the fullest extent. horrible decisions and greed and also making russia a fucking super power in the game is whats most annoying but hey thats just my take lol
1 Like
first they call T-72 a good tank, then they say a BMP-2M module WITHOUT APFSDS belt on 11.3 tank is OP. Whats next, BT-5 should be 12.0?
1 Like
look where we got, the Leopard 2a4 spam wasnt bad, but the BMPT is. Cry more tho
1 Like
That the problem, not any ‘bias’
1 Like
Why is the solution always just “remove them”? I’ve had no issue w/ BMPTs at higher tiers but they’re still viable, move them up.
1 Like
Each time USSR gets something that isnt worst machine on the rank, it ends up with US mains crying. Yeah, duh, USSR has some pretty good push-and-flank machines that devs never add because of “ussr bias” :/
1 Like
This game isn’t based on USA vs Russia unlike your claim.
Also its not just USA players its the whole community complains about BMPT series except BMPT users because they dont want too see their absurd vehicle getting balanced.
This thing has absurd unrealistic survivability while having twin 30MM that doesnt have its proper dispersion and can easily wreck anything on its way.
If BMPT’s didn’t have such BS survivability and have historical dispersion for it’s main guns it wouldn’t be as problematic as it is right now.
But hey its legit as long as you keep your op vehicle in its current state right?
3 Likes
Never said that. Lol.
No, its those who always had a first hand on battles who complain.
Same as any other USSR MBT. Just smaller weak zones. Funny how it became “op” when it lost most magic weakspot?
it proper ammunition for the rank it is now, yes. Decent autocannon on weakest belt is again OP somehow.
it wouldnt be BMPT, it would be another poorly made USSR tank with armor that only exists on paper.
1 Like
This I’d be fine with. Its weird that slower autocannons prioritises Accuracy/Precision while faster autocannons sacrifice it for sheer damage- but both in game have the same accuracy so slower autocannons are generally just worse. Not enough dispersion to make it a liability but atleast somewhat noticeable.
1 Like
Yea dude its totally same weakspot size and has nothing to do with overperforming ERA,spall liners or belts that suppose to be internal but somehow its external.
Not to mention somehow same weakspots doesnt work half of the time compare to T-Series.
Have you ever thought cannon itself isn’t the main problem but the combination of absurd survivability, high ROF with unrealistic accuracy and having missiles are the main reason why its so problematic? Ofc you didn’t cause you can’t.
Yea man I’m pretty sure BMPT can soak M829A2 or similiar rounds or any other AGM/ATGM with its armor easily.
1 Like
Shooting era with HEAT must protect the tank. Lol.
Oh so now they are OP? So, why didnt you get to that conclusion when it was only NATO side machinery that got them? Its again only OP when it makes USSR competitive, not “point and kill”.
Yeah right… Its the USSR only that has unrealistic accuracy, for sure…
I know it isnt the problem. The problem is that its one decent machine that GETS SOMETHING in return of being oneshottable, without rear gears, and with weak autocannon for the rank, and its already too much for US mains to fight. When it was germany with leopard 2s…
1 Like
An ERA that provides couple hundred CE somehow protect the tank from AGM that has tandem warhead, yea dude totally realistic indeed Xd.
Do I need to remind you that T-90M was the first MBT that recieved spall liners before anyone else? Only after huge backlash from community Gaijin decided to implement spall liners to the other vehicles on the same dev server, also countless NATO vehicles still missing their spall liner.
Not so smart huh?
Its the only support vehicle that doesnt lack in other areas while other light vehicles has to sacrifice something for one aspect.
Oh is that the reason why BMPT’s caused huge mess in MM and recieved significant amount br changes in couple weeks?
They are still causing massive problems due to their broken damage model/survivability and combination of high ROF double barrel 30mm’s and missiles but hey lacking reverse speed surely negates all those positive sides.
Get real dude, you’re not fooling anyone on this thread.
You sure need to. As i remember otherwice. Challengers and Abramses got it first
yeah the point is - its NOT LIGHT. Its one heavy ass machine, which has mobility of same T-72 it is based on. Which means it has no mobility in comparison.
Yeah, basic BR was a bit low, thats for sure. 10.3 for BMP-2M with armor was one insane move. But 11.3? Its MORE than enough. Id end it up at 11.0 with current armanment systems.
dont make it sound like it matters, as it cant shoot both at the same time and cant load both with APDS belts even. Bruh.
The damage model is busted atm to be fair and thats just laziness, not russian bias
1 Like
Abram’s never recieved spall liners and Challengers were the 3rd or 4th tanks that recieved spall liners iirc.
Even this comment shows how clueless and one sided you are.
No need to further this conversation with you.
1 Like
Its not Russian bias its purposely keeping the BMPT’s in current state in order to milk people more.
Its a deliberate choice made by Gaijin, has nothing to do with bias.
5 Likes
Exactly, and its the same as with most OP vehicles before being nerfed. Its in a similar vein to the T58; its still undertiered and hasn’t been nerfed despite being in game for as long as the BMPT’s…
2 Likes