You need to reach their sides first.
Yes, you still had to destroy their barrel and tracks in time and then go for a side shot kill.
1 Like
Which if you’re not under an ideal network environment, may not even work before you’ve a round in one side and out the other. Case for most any autocannon really.
2 Likes
This visualizes some of my points.
Meta shifting def changed the environment in 11.7-12.7 no doubt, still its far from bein miserable i believe.
Penetration isn’t the only thing which BMPT showed us many times, real problem was ROF and accuracy which with latest uptade it got heavily nerfed on that aspect.
What makes you think BMPT will go out toe to toe every single time with enemy mbts but rather wait for chance to catch him off guard, you always take this scenario into your hands as if they are always 1vs1, come back to real life.
Personally i also wouldn’t mind as it was broken af.
It was still dominating up until last uptade. I unlocked mine when it was bumped to 11.7 and never had issues, in fact i got 2.4+ K/D ratio alongside with 63-65 WR fighting against 12.7-13.0, shows how broken were still is.
Nope.
To be fair that 30mm APDS is found down at 7.3 on BTR-80, but with a lower rate of fire.
Not at lower BRs.
Tell that to my BMPT when it was demolishing mbts through their driver ports, destroying their tracks and barrels so they can both immobilized and can’t fire, you sure you played with BMPT’s or are you just making assumptions based on your opinion?
Not really, you can just immobilize them and kill them with atgm’s upon it.
Now compare to MBT which can do that but better, and go toe to toe with MBTs.
I unlocked it at 11.7 as well, and it has rather worse performance vs my MBTs. I have to play much more ratty to get close performance to them.
Problem with BMPT at 10.3/7 was never the autocannon really. It was the armor, the darts at that BR heavily struggle to pen Relikt and people did not figure out to shoot below it. If it was the ROF/Accuracy the BMP-2M would be dominating (its not).
1 Like
You were overpushing multiple times, exposed to multiple sides while aiming terribly and you did expect to destroy those tanks rather easily?
My eyes certainly bleeding and my mind committed suicide upon these gameplay footages, no wonder why you think this vehicle is so bad.
I also got some funny numbers on certain vehicles, but never really thought they were broken.
Impressive.
So you need to jump through multiple hoops just to kill a single enemy, so broken.
At that point I’d just use 120/125mm gun and be better off lol.
1 Like
No shit my man, who could’ve guess that dedicated MBT could go toe to toe with another MBT better than BMPT?
News flash BMPT isn’t and MBT so stop treating like one.
Thats on you.
Forgot about that. I think its closer to BMP-2 anyway, that worse ROF is cancerous to play with.
I’m not exactly sure. No comment. Both could be valid options.
Leclerc’s are closer to M1A1 in performance (M1A1 is still better) than M1A2, which makes them being an entire BR bracket apart even more comedic
1 Like
In MBT I can pull off all of these pushes and come out on top.
If a vehicle is forced into passive playstyle is it really good?
1 Like
Just play passive and hope an enemy shows you his side so your peashooter can do it’s job, or at least try to lol.
1 Like
What is BMPT supposed to go toe to toe with then? Its got all the qualities of MBTs without the main caliber cannon. Its certainly not fast (light tanks). Though I am playing BMPT over PUMA/KF41/Etc every day of the week.
Is it really though.
“It was once able to push without fail so it’s clearly still good” seems to be their position. What it can do, you’d do better in a BMP2.
2 Likes
Trying to project i see, the whole point was you guys were claiming BMPT became much worse than when it was while in reality it was still as good as before.
Its quite easy, i recommend focusing on precise aiming rather than treating like 120mm shell.
Which doesn’t even take 5 seconds while using heavily armored IFV.
So you expected that armored ifv should destroy mbts as fast as a dedicated MBT can?
Oh boy i have bad news for you.
Given it was optimised for urban engagements, it should be able to at least advance on a threat instead of sit there passively until it is inevitably flanked, navigated around, or struck from orbit. It’s not a chally, optimised to strike some sod in an adjacent province.
How are we wrong in saying that 11.7 BMPT is much worse than when it was lower?
Most MBTs you cannot even pen frontally with 30mm APDS, and with that accuracy, i’m not sure if “precise” is in the room with us.
MBT takes milliseconds. Seconds matter at top tier.
Its not even an IFV.
1 Like
What ?
Precise aiming on a highly inaccurate cannon.
Will try to remember that one.
5s to kill an enemy < kill an enemy in a single click
So what should I do with it then ?
You aren’t really flanking with it as with other IFVs.
1 Like