The capture point thing is straight cheeks and only one spawns at a time. It doesn’t help that attack helicopters can still land on it after wiping out all the targets. A true capture objective would be exclusive to utility and transport helis.
1 Like
I agree, and there should be multiple spawned at a time. With the positive that if attack helicopters help utility/cargo helicopters to capture the points the entire team gets silver lions and rp. But make sure to restrict it just to cargo/large helicopters that can carry troops. Not attack helicopters. (This will though make defining whether the Mi-24’s should be able to capture or not an issue)
1 Like
I think the Mi-24 should be an exception. Yeah, they can carry troops, but a dedicated transport helicopter can carry way more. So, while some armed helis can carry troops they won’t entirely hog all of the objectives like attack helis do now. For example, the Mi-24 can carry around 8 troops while the V-22 can carry up to 24 troops. Theoretically the V-22 would capture objectives faster. (If more troops = faster capture times like ground RB). Hopefully with the addition of transport helis, there would be more objectives than just transporting infantry. Theres’s cargo missions, search and rescue and EVAC missions that could only be done by utility and transport helis.
1 Like
If the 2 x AGM-176 Griffin Air to Ground guided missiles are added, it depends what Gaijin would choose for it’s range. If they go for the 20 km range, it should be above 11.3 BR.
1 Like
yes
2 Likes
Considering it’s speed I would think that would be a good idea.
Just going to leave these here found some pages on the cockpit for the MV-22 from an AGARD report.
A short but interesting read going through the cockpit layout and MFD displays. Also does include from planned improvements which mention a HMS/HMD system and integrated weapons controls for the nose turret gun.
If you want to check it out for yourself here it is:
AGARD Advisory Report 349: Flight Vehicle Integration Panel Working Group 21 on Glass Cockpit Operational Effectiveness (l’Efficacite operationnelle du poste de pilotage en verre)
PDF Pages 156 - 160 for the MV-22. There is a bunch of information about a bunch of other NATO aircraft too, those start from PDF pages 79.
It is fully declassified and approved for public release and distribution unlimited as stated on the front cover. Also stated that it is open access from the NATO Science & Technology Organization site which does itself have the document to download.
1 Like
If their military used it and it doesn’t dilute either tree, then why not? eg Japan needed CAS, and they got it through Thai aircraft (AV-8S from Spain, F-5A from USA, F-84G from USA, etc.). Copy and Paste can be great for a tree while not taking away from the export nation. Its bad when abused and used to be lazy.
those are your tanks…
meanwhile, the US during the Cold War onward: no, it’s our tanks.
Spoiler
m41, m47, m48, m44, m113, m60, m42, m19…
This is an incredibly detailed and fair video around the V-22 Osprey and how currently it is ontrack as a new military product even with it’s crash history.
2 Likes
I mean it is Boeing after all lol
2 Likes
I don’t think it has a place in the current game, maybe in the future.
Dude screw you, just play nintendo if you want exclusivity that much.
1989? As long as this…contraption crashes & blows up in a frequently spectacular & satisfyingly entertaining way in the game, then yes please put it in and don’t skimp on the effects
No, since it should stop at the Hs 132, Ta 183, Me 263, Ju 287, He 343 or on the date of May 23, 1945
japan more than likely didnt even have the rocket pods equipped. Also unsure if the GAU-17 was even bought for Japanese Ospreys. so they would be unarmed and pointless
I really don’t care if they have weapons or not. it existing alone would be very funny and I want to see a video of someone stealing caps with osprey for the entire duration of the match.
ok then they can just use the US osprey?
1 Like
I dont have US tree air that high to warrant such funny vehicle. hate their air tree anyway.
its going to be in heli tree probably. And you are basically saying that bc you just dont want to play US the Osprey should be given to Japan for no good reason
1 Like
oh yeah it’s technically a helo with vertical flight and props. well, not gonna play it then.
1 Like