Sigh.
The gun used by the begeleight is the bofors 57mm which is a gun used by many navies around the world.
Hence the performance characteristics of a new round would be classified DUH
There are far better suited rounds to be used on naval vessels than a 57mm APFSDS
1 Like
Who am i to say that no one wants APFSDS?
maybe it was a telescopic apfsds or idfk.
He said no sources that are public.
Period.
He didnt say sources.
The fact that he had to out public in there means something whether you like it or not.
It’s already OP, so, if you want A 2.0 BR bump, be my guest.
1 Like
It would be great to move the begleitpanzer 57 up, it is a nightmare to face if the person driving has at least two braincells working.
2 Likes
First hand NATO sources aren’t always considered reliable. So i’d still bet on Wiki
100% agree, move it to Rank 7 give the IRST and APFSDS and make it 10.3 atleast.
I’d also move the Radkampfwagen to Rank 6, idk why it’s at Rank 7
1 Like
submit this as sources for bug report
You still dont seem to understand what is needed for reports and to change vehicles.
This is not enough for a suggestion
1 Like
I wish i could but i don’t have the source of this graph
I have a larger document but it doesn’t say what it is from
oh then we can’t do anything
I just don’t get it… we know the 57mm bofors gets apfsds and there are documents about it but they are all classified for some reason and I am not foolish enough to post them here. Like why is it classified? No tank project has used it for like 48 years…
The documents about the apfsds are mostly classified, but we dont even have them, sadly.
Otherwise, we could make use of them somehow in a legal way.
1 Like
I like the ‘somehow in a legal way’ part
1 Like
fantastic source