+1 i love the AT-6 this would be such a cool aircraft to see
4 Likes
Honestly, if the AT-6 aka the T-6 Texan II is added to the game, we get ever so closer to the T-6 Texan and all its aesthetic variants to be added. Cause man, I would love to fly myself a BT-13/BT-15 “Aichi D3A Val” or the T-6 Texans meant to look like B5N’s, B6N’s, and A6M’s. Would be very very :) Goofy for scare tactics in Sim.
3 Likes
Umm, compared to its father, the PC-9, the T-6 family with its bloated cockpit can barely be called “aesthetic”.
2 Likes
-1
I voted “no” as for all COIN aircraft suggestions, as they have from my pov no place in Air RB.
Why?
The pure nature of any COIN aircraft is to participate in asymmetric warfare - the current design of wt is unable (and imho also unwilling) to offer these combat scenarios.
There is no real place for them in Air RB - either they are totally helpless vs jets or they are placed so low, that they bully WW2 props - and i see this “bullying” factor with “time travellers” highly critical.
I mean if you look at the option to put 2-4 FN 0.50 cal gunpods on them, it is not hard to imagine that this plane would flood low BRs in Air RB.
I would have voted “yes” if you would have added an option to put them within the Helicopter tree within the game - as from my pov most of the countless COIN aircraft proposals make actually sense from an aircraft enthusiast’s perspective - but not from a game play perspective in Air RB.
Placing these COIN aircraft within the Helicopter trees would prevent those planes from polluting Air RB - and frankly spoken in Ground RB most people somehow don’t seem to care about what kind of helicopter or aircraft killed them.
So if you consider addressing the place where to put them (Air tree or Heli tree) and add an adequate (from your pov) BR for this aircraft i might change my mind.
The overall quality of this suggestion is as usual: Top!
Nevertheless - if i see this recurring remark:
I am not sure if this just useless.
As things as “any aggressive kind or verbal abuse” are highly subjective and usually based on “feelings” - your remark looks actually useless as others might have deviating personal standards and their posts might hurt feelings, but they might be in line with the forum rules at the same time.
Schind…If you read what I wrote I was referring to all the aircraft variants built on a T-6 Texan that was used in a lot of WW2 films such as Tora Tora Tora. Or the 1980’s Final Countdown. Facepalm
If you’re going to add the T-6 Texan you might as well as these options, which won’t change the performance but would make the craft look cool and would allow us to recreate a lot of scenes from famous films to a 1:1.
Oh boy, facepalm indeed!
I stand corrected and ashamed for not reading your thread correctly. Weeell, I’m a bit short tempered if it comes to the Pilatus aircraft, as they were built just a mile from where I grew up, haha!
Of course the “true” T-6 beats any of the new trainers by lenghts, without question.
(BTW if you are interested, a few friends of mine have a project ongoing right now that aims at getting the last Swiss AT-16 (our designation for the T-6) airworthy again: www.U-328.ch )
2 Likes
I’ll look into it thanks.
1 Like
3 Likes
these type of prop aircrafts are not in the game yet i think, prop planes with modern weapon, like brazilian Tucano. we need them, they are good low flying cas for ground battles
add it to japan
1 Like
The RTAF could be as a sub-tree, though wouldn’t be replacing any of the R2Y’s since gaijin still needs to find 3 proper substitutes.
almost all asian countries like thailand, singapore belong to japan, excpet those like vietnam, north korea, they belong to china
good video how its HUD works
Very nice, thx
