Since gaijin made a point of saying that this will carry both Fritz X & Hs 293, that makes it an R4
Four, if gaijin did their research:
5 Likes
We never gonna get it
1 Like
Always with interesting informations about the German stuff !
You do a good job each time. 👍
2 Likes
Continuing the discussion from Why Are battle Passes going down hill?:
Have in that the German have captured one:
1 Like
Don’t tempt me on this one… Or I will wish we have it one way or another.
1 Like
Do you mind linking the source? Would really like to read it :)
Dont know if its the same source but this image from one of your previous posts states it only could carry 3, so one is wrong and the other must be corret.
1 Like
The A-3/R4 or R3 inherit the same defensive armament as the A-3/R2, which is exactly the same as the current A-5. Anyway, it’s not like a 20mm MG-FF instead of a 20mm MG 151 would make any real difference. What actually would have been different is if Gaijin had chosen something like the He 177 A-1 (a more sensible option instead of the cheap copy-paste), as at least it had a ventral revolving turret and wider firing angles.
2 Likes
They should both have a feature where their engines catch on fire if you use WEP for too long
1 Like
It also has less than half the climb rate, and can’t fire its bombs off several kilometers from the target - meaning its in danger longer when bombing and is at a lower altitude.
Whilst the plane could carry 2 under fuselage racks the ground clearance of the rear missile was minimal. Ive seen drawings but never found a pic of the double fit and it seems the standard loadout was a single plus the wing missiles.
2 Likes
The B-29 has a climb rate of 6.5m/s and the 177 has 8.0. That is not “less than half”. Additionally, the Hs 293 has 300kg of explosives. I’m assuming that’s what you mean by “firing its bombs off at multiple kilometers”, the insane idea of using 293s, these manually-guided, optically-tracked rockets, for base bombing. Resulting in less than a ton of payload on target at best- compared to ten tons for the B-29.
With a full load of bombs the B-29 definitely has less than half the climb rate. Also, using the guided bombs from kilometers away is safer than the B-29’s use-case, where it can’t score without getting close. Getting essentially a free ton of payload without having to be remotely close to the base seems like a massive plus.
No.
3 Likes
Pal you mean 20? 40000 LB divided by 2,000LB = 20
No, it’s 20,0000lb unless I’m crazy
500x40
Oh what. Shiz. Dang it. Lmao my math stopped mathing
How to say “i never play bombers” without saying i never play bombers.
1T of payload is nothing. For base bombings you will still use classic bombs
It’s not like that matters though, bombers in this game are mostly free kills just waiting to get shot down. This one won’t be much different, not to mention it’s a copypaste. I wonder when will we finally get a decent battle pass vehicle again. The last one was probably that french AMX thingy or a Strikemaster. Everything else since then was total garbage
4 Likes
Can’t. It seems that both sites that I use for pdf books are down:
https://singlelogin.re/book/1147319/f5155b/heinkel-he-177-277-274.html?dsource=recommend
https://archive.org/details/heinkel-he-177-277-274_compress
Well, in that book, it states that the Kehl III can control both the PC 1400X & Hs 293 with the A-3/R4, (not R3 gaijin) receiving the Kehl III. Additionally, the Kehl IV can control up to FOUR such weapons:
Still, its a difference ballistically, unlike the identical Shermans, T-34s, Spitfires, il-2s etc which proliferate this game. As for the A-1, I am not sure if you are joking but the A-1 had numerous issues with its DB 606 engine. Gaijin was actually smart (for once) in putting in an aircraft with the DB 610
4 Likes