Oni decal seems nice rest is pretty meh
You’ll be disappointed - it’s not very good even at its BR.
1 Like
More T-44 variants are nice, this unique prototype/early production vehicle is a breath of fresh air compared to the (very boring) French M46.
However, I’m holding out for the most interesting T-44 variant, the T-44MS prototypes. It has been suggested here before. They were based off of the T-44M which had the T-54 drivetrain and running gear. The MS was equipped with a two plane stabilizer. It would have had access to modern HEAT-FS rounds like those found in game with the ASU-85. The second prototype also had night vision capabilities.
5 Likes
New T-44 as of now is 6.3.
This BP is dead on release
6 Likes
L battle pass
2 Likes
It’s obviously an intentional decision to screw over the majority of people so that they gamble and engage with the game more, with the side benefit of them maybe playing naval with their new ship they didn’t want. Gaijin knows that people don’t want ships. I mean, I actually like playing naval, but from the queue times and the lack of gameplay variety other than point-and-click, an event naval vehicle serves no one other than Gaijin to be loot-crate padding to lower the chances of people getting the vehicle they actually want.
1 Like
Haha silly you, that cant be possibly true.
1 Like
I would much rather take the m46, this bp vehicle UD more intriguing but going to be bad
If it was a 5.7, 6.0 it may be better… worthless as the last few bps.
They just had a really good event tank. FV4030
Yeah when I first saw this tank, I assumed that a BR of 6.3 would be adequate. Now, combining the new datamined information with the simple fact that the Production T-44 should already be 6.3 makes it clear to me that this is the wrong BR for the T-44-85.
Gszabi’s new datamines give us a raw stat comparison that already looks less than promising. Note that comparison of the cannons is irrelevant as they share the same ballistics in-game anyways.
A side-by-side view with the datamined statcard image also helps reveal the glaring new weakpoints and design faults
It seems as though the only thing holding Gaijin back from making it a 6.0 is the presence of the BR-367 APHE shell, of which I would have no problem removing for the sake of a more acceptable battle rating.
9 Likes
It being bad is simply poor Gaijin balancing; as far as tanks go, the design isn’t anything unusable. Besides, I would easily take a “bad” but unique vehicle over a meta copy paste one, although I understand this opinion is generally pretty subjective.
I thought that with the earlier cannon model it wouldn’t have BR-367. But i still don’t think it deserves 6.3
Ok, it doesnt appear to have 138,6 mm guns, but only one gun of this caliber.
1 Like
Another unique tank and another load of comments complaining despite the SL rewards from the BP being worth it, let alone the vehicles and other bonuses.
People have to undertsand that a BP isn’t just here to cater to their personal interests every time. Some people do play naval. In fact, some people even play helicopters. And some people don’t play tanks. So just deal with the fact, that the free reward isn’t always a plane or tank or british.
If you find nothing interesting, then just skip it for now and see what the next one brings. It only a trivial aspect of life.
4 Likes
I really like how many players decided to trick the “random” vehicle box system, by buying additional vehicles on the marketplace.
Yesterday the ORP Garland became the most popular vehicle and its price increased from 2.5 GJN to 8.5 GJN:
Spoiler
Hundreds of them were sold after the new BP vehicle box was announced.
The situation of Matilda Hedgehog is a bit more complicated, because the vehicle was already pretty expensive, but you can notice similar situation, with the price that increased from 17 GJN to 26 GJN in less than one day as many of them were sold:
Spoiler
The vehicle box is random, but since you can’t get duplicates, if you e.g. only had ORP Garland and Tandem MAI missing, by buying ORP Garland for 2.5 GJN yesterday, you could guarantee yourself to get the Tandem MAI.
I must admit that this is the reason why I thought the devs will never add vehicles with sellable coupons to vehicle boxes.
I know it won’t happen, but imagine one day we’ll have the IS-7 in a vehicle box and 3 random vehicles that can be bought on the marketplace. Suddenly, many players will be willing to pay even 100 GJN for each of these 3 additional vehicles, because then the IS-7 would still be “pretty cheap”. That’s hilarious.
It is obvious that basically no one buys ORP Garland just to play it, after the devs announced the next BP. Players just want to increase their chances (or even make it a 100%, if they own additional vehicles) of getting something they really want.
7 Likes
That’s why the idea of random box itself is stupid. If people go so far as to overpay 5 times for an absolutely garbage vehicle they will never play just to increase the chance of getting what they want, then maybe, just maybe you should let them choose what they want
6 Likes
Or maybe everybody should finally admit that whole markets, auctions etc was bad idea and should never been implemented into the game in the first place
You’re missing the point entirely, this is how money is made
Doing what you suggest would impact income
How many people have bought gjn to buy those shops for example? Or bought gjn ready to buy things
Gaijin now has that money. Allowing people to choose what they’d like from a box would impact that income stream no matter how small it may or may not be
1 Like