KINGSTON UPON THAMES MENTIONED!!!
5 Likes
Can we finally get this things flaps fixed at the very least.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ppx2SNUhcf1s
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ILdHAMOonJKP
Bug report accepted to fix top speed.
Lmao you realize that report isn’t for a sea harrier right?
At the same time the report to increase its sustained turn rates has also been accepted.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/C52LhZwRhiGI
And as the Sea Harrier goes
A report to give the Harrier 1s unlimited AOA even at high speeds was passed (also increasing the buffet onset to 40 degrees AOA vs 16)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/JQD9kJoxev1F
5 Likes
I wonder if they will ever fix the thrust
Will accelerate at almost 1G at .55 Mach AOA 0 degrees with the flaps at MID
That would be around 8 M/S in forwards acceleration
In game we get a whole 2.8 M/S
@Gunjob is acceleration a value that can even be reported?
5 Likes
You would have to calculate acceleration yourself based on change in speed over time, rather than rely on WTRI, but I can’t see why not.
5 Likes
Acceleration in M/S is also on Local host
Would that be accepted?
Doing it for speed changed over time would create a lot of room for error.
If it’s local host I assume it is fine then. Thought it was one of those values WTRTI calculates like SEP.
nvm it was climb in meters a second labeled Vy
Should take approximately 5 seconds to accelerate from 366 knots to 433.
Takes 10-11 in game. The medium speed acceleration of the Harrier effectively needs to be doubled.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9nl0iq2GhLP3
6 Likes
bug reports
drop tanks
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/EJ6FJTa8p0PP
sneb rockets
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/BbJJoSfHgttu
missing martel missile
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/duEYBcXhBcIH
6 Likes
Well it only could carry Sea Eagle not sure about the indian one.
Did you report the 540 lbs bombs
i dont own anything that mentions them and you only sent me a snippet i dont know the origin of
Ahh ohh well no worries.
I doubt we’ll get the other things but thanks for trying
Harrier 809
Best sources ive got for 190 gallon tank for post-falklands FRS1 (So SQV) and the FA2
Pretty sure it should only get AS.37 anti-radar Martels, not the TV guided AJ.168. I’ve not seen anything to suggest the Harrier was compatible with the datalink pod, and every aircraft which was known to be compatible with AJ.168 had at least two crew, with the second crew member flying the missile (flying Martel was hard enough by itself, without also having to fly the plane).
The FA.2 radar isn’t tiny by any means it’s the Blue Vixen it went on to become the ECR-90 in the EFT.
So saying a Sea Harrier radar would struggle against an Eagle is nonsense.
Blue vixen is predecessor of current EFT’s radar which is worse than F-15’s radar in most way.
This is like saying F-15A is almost as good as F-15EX in terms multirole capabilities because they share the same design.
It’s stated as being one of the best radars in the world for its day lol.
Arguing that the FA.2 radar is bad is just silly.
2 Likes