BAe Harrier II (UK versions) - Technical data and discussion

Oh yeah 100%.

Throw in the 100% LERX, TERMA Pod, Sniper T-Pod, etc.

There is 0 excuse to not add it at this point.

1 Like

They probability forgot about it like the Jaguar variants XD
Classic case with how they have been doing UK for the past years…
They where memeing with us when they droped the T10 instead of a GR9A with older payloads…

Even funnier when the T10 is actually more like the T12 (GR9A Trainer)

But yeah, there is a lot of things left to be added. But alas, Britain never made anything domestic and therefore we are 100% dependent on 4 Sub-TTs to get anything new according to Gaijin

There is still so manny cold war jets that can be added but no lol we 100 % needed another f18… aham sure Gijin 🤣

1 Like

Nah, Mig-29 and Su-30 C&P Next

1 Like

God that will be a so funny…
But still , i prefer to dominate in Sim with UK jets not with sub tree jets , i play UK to play UK and i am a Sim player , i enjoy the plane i fly by knowing its weaknesses and its strengths , i dont whant a Mig 29 i whant a gnat a new Jag a new harrier a Vulcan ex…
I whant more UK jets to fill those roles even if they are not top tier.

2 Likes

I couldnt agree with you more.

I really want all those aircraft too

1 Like

What is Lerx again ?

Leading edge route extension or something like that. Its the round bits where the wing meets the fuselage.

Harrier Gr7 has a 60% LERX iirc.

GR9 is 100%

1 Like

So leading edge extension, with a different name got it

1 Like

It should have came with Brimstone.

Issue is that the GR9A only used Brimstone 1s, not Brimstone DMs (So no SAL)

Now whether or not we should have been restricted to SAL only for the past 2 years is another matter entirely, but Gaijin will die on some hills and bend them for others, and they never bend it for Britain. So a GR9A with SAL Brimstones would never happen because “historical accuracy” despite everything else to do with the Harriers

1 Like

In the face of Kh38 MT (not saying it’s fake, just the fact it isn’t fielded nor does it seem to be scheduled for mass production), I feel a Gr9 with SAL brimstones should have been a completely acceptable addition to them. It is not like we’re fudging spear 3 onto the thing. Also wouldn’t be the first time guidance was fudged for balance, if we look at the buccaneer’s payload. Or the missing MMW that’s been stripped from a few weapons not just brimstone.

That’s if we absolutely had to stick to no MMW seekers. Though I feel a harrier would be the best testbed for that kind of seeker. It’s a harrier, it’s not exactly travelling at obscene speeds to get more range out of the munition.

1 Like

Yeah, it would be a good for it