“No, please don’t ruin ARB for those worthless PVE-loving Zombers who ruin the game and free-ride the match. We need to make them learn how to A2A, not babysitting them.” /s
If Gaijin ever thinks about bombers or Bomber players… I reckon we wouldn’t have been treated like this at all at the very beginning.
Soon™ (Probably takes three years or more)
Or just Gaijin is frightened about those phantoms when the Tu-4 was a death star.
they need to add r-27ep to mig-29/su-27 and their variants to take down these ECM air craft.
130km, 5.8 mach stick of doom that hones in on radar emissions and ECM, yes please.
Why did they add the AGM-84H without proper low altitude terrain following and LOAL? why did they add the AGM-154 without stealth? Why havent they added the ability for the P-61 to lock its turret forward after almost a decade? Why haven’t they added top attack to any atgm that has it other than the LMUR? i can go on all day… If you have followed this game for any decent amount of time you’d know it’s simply because the devs are incredibly incompetent at everything other than making (or outsourcing) 3d models…
The gunner position was remove in the end of 1991. They did not start physically removing them till 1992 and finished the last on in 94. And as quoted i mentioned the paint.
In the 60+ years that the h has been flying because it is still in the process of being upgraded to the j. It has only 3 external changes. Only 2 would be significant to this jet that would put it as possible 90s late 80s.
It’s not a targeting pod, the AN/ASQ-151(AAQ-6 “FLIR” & AVQ-22 “LLLTV”) EVS was initially for aiding navigation, and like the A-7 should correlate with the A2G Radar and are effectively navigational aids for the flight crew to help mange requirements of the Low-level Ingress mission set, which was retired with the fielding of the FB-111A & B-1B.
If you wanted a TGP you’d get the LITENING or SNIPER pods for offensive use.
Yes, but they have added many cruise missiles to it of new generations. And they had experimented with the notion turning it into a missile truck with aim-120s
Though I do partially think it would have made more sense to add the B-1B & Tu-160, for this event. But I’d guess that they may well be holding onto them as Capstone Airframes for the Bomber line of their respective Tech Trees.
Unfortunately gaijin’s current stance has already denied JDAMs and the sort, they called it a “Pre-1991” model… Ie basically no guided ordinance besides like AGM-86Cs.
So i just did a google search to see when the b52h used agm 142s so please take it with a grain of salt seeing as its google but it said they integrated the agn 142 into the b52h with the 1988 upgrades so we could see the agm 142 on it if we get a bug report out for it but it also means they would have to add the agm 142 to israel
Who said i was making a bug report i just said its an option if someone wanted to because it would be historically inaccurate but that probably doesn’t go for american because the Russian would have something on par
Precedent: “Even though F-100F IRL can be equipped with AIM-9J/P, we decided not to give it.
We wanted to see that the Chinese player uses this event vehicle as a CAS machine”
Result: Became an inferior F-100A/D, which nobody plays.