What’s the difference?
The chassis.
2 Likes
BP version is a nuke cannon at its BR xD
Just bring HE and aim for hatches, MG ports ,etc
2 Likes
Huh ok.
1 Like
In WT there is the Lancia 3Ro with the 100mm howitzer and the Breda 52 with 90/53. So the 3Ro with the 90/53 is missing
2 Likes
That…doesn’t even answer the question, but…ok.
What? What are you asking?
Mate, I asked what the difference was, what’s with the hostility all of a sudden?
What hostility? I just couldn’t grasp what you wasn’t understanding. And I tried to ask you, and then I made a post to try to explain if the difficulty was about the chassis and the guns difference
2 Likes
The difference between Breda 52 and Lancia 3Ro?
Lancia would be a bit more sluggish due to lower engine power.
Here is more detailed comparison of characteristics:
3 Likes
THANK You. That’s the correct answer. Unlike what Italian"ACE" said. Now to have fun reading :D)
Man you are hostile, I was trying to understand what difference you were searching and you didn’t helped
What’s the matter with my nickname
4 Likes
@SinisterIsRandom sorry I couldn’t help you. I didn’t realise you wanted to know about the difference in mobility. I will bury the hatchet and move on, ok?
I hope M44 won’t slower the addition of this thing…
3 Likes
It will definitely.
1 Like
Does anyone know any other Tanks that have a similar amount of Aphe filler (enough to overpressure) and are quite fast?
2 Likes
Maybe some other gun truck like the 102 mm on Fiat 634N.
1 Like
Granted the M44 really doesn’t make any sense at 4.0, it uses a 155mm howitzer with M107 and a Bulldog chassis but is 2.0 lower than the M109?
I see how the difference would warrant a lower BR but 4.0 is odd, especially with how most of the opposing tanks are similarly mobile mediums and the M44’s reload is pretty difficult to justify when compared to other TDs at the same BR.
I’d say 4.7 or 5.0 would’ve been better options whilst still providing for lineups.
2 Likes
More Italian boomsticks on trucks are always fun. +1
2 Likes