Because it’s an American tank used by the Australians. It’s not an Australian tank. The Australian vehicles are in the British tree.
1 Like
Related, what would the USA squadron vehicle be then?
Both India and Pakistan have beef with China (and each other naturally).
Does America drive the Abrams for the Australian army too?
The fact that they aren’t consistent about the rules, and every time they aren’t consistent about the rules it’s the UK tree that gets shafted, is clear as day evidence that they have some grudge against the UK. I’m honestly surprised they are giving the UK tree the T-90. It won’t be good, naturally, if it were good it would be going into the Russia tree, but it’s still something I guess.
So take out all of the British vehicles in the US tree, take out all captured premiums, take out the B-57 because that is a British license built vehicle, take out the Spitfire, Mustang 1, and other vehicles
1 Like
Did the British drive the AIM for Aussies? No.
1 Like
The B-57 was built and used by the US. The AIM is not built or used by the British. See how it’s different?
I never claimed that the AIM was built or used by the British, also funny how you cannot give me a reason why the other vehicles I’ve mentioned shouldn’t be removed
2 Likes
No one ever claimed that. We are claiming it’s an Australian vehicle, and unless GJN wants to make a separate Australia tree, so far all the Aussie vehicles go to the UK tree.
Reason 1: The British didn’t use the AIM.
Reason 2: the US does use the AIM.
Reason 3: the Australians do not build their M1A1s. They are built by the US.
The B-57 was built and used by the US military, so it belongs. Captured premiums are in every tree. That has nothing to do with the AIM.
The Swiss Hunter is a squadron vehicle donut.
Vehicles used by nations that do not have a tree go to the next logical tree. Domestic Australian vehicles belong in the British tree. US tanks used by the Australians do not belong in the British tree.
1 Like
You are ignoring my points of removing other countries vehicles from America.
Australia used the AIM so it should go in the British tech tree, otherwise they should remove other countries vehicles from the American tech tree
Why the distinction?
Give us our Spitfire back then! Maybe even the Mustang! British vehicles in the British tree!
The same reason the Leopard C2A is in the German tree and not the British tree.
The Spitfire is from the closed beta to represent the US volunteers that flew them in combat before the US joined the war. Again, completely different than the AIM.
I agree it is the same reason, but we are talking about different reasons. The actual reason is GJN don’t have a set rule and just pick and choose on a case by case basis, normally resulting in them shafting the UK.
The Italian Tree has a German built Hungarian BF109. Why are you not crying about that?
1 Like
I am laughing my ass off at this. The LF IX was implemented AFTER the US joined the war in 1942. This is not different to the AIM in any way. The LF IXc was a British Spitfire that was provided to the US through lend-lease. The M1A1 AIM was an American Abrams that was provided to the Australians through lend-lease.
