Really neither of them should be in the British tech tree, the challengers are underperforming and should have been buffed years ago and there are other British vehicles that could have been added.
The commonwealth is a great way to get vehicles that aren’t from in game nations into the game, like the LAV especially since Britain is lacking when it comes to ifvs
But it seems like they’re gonna add the t90M soon so maybe it was just easier for them to make that model either way, bad practice
I agree. Completely, I was thinking something like the Scorpion 90. A few commonwealth nations used it. Would have been perfect for a SQV and the standard Scorpion could have come to the TT. Everyone is happy.
Association of states/nation, in War Thunder it is similar to an alliance, as Australian, Canadian, NZ, SA, and India are all represented in the British tree, so either move all Commonwealth nation’s vehicles into the British tree, or separate them, maybe into 1 tree.
So what you’re saying is that the the Grant I in the British premium tree should be in the American tech tree, same as the Mustang I? Even though these vehicles were NOT used by the US, same as the Grant in the American premium tree and the Mustang I in the American tt, those last two vehicles should BOTH be in the British tt.
Looks like you’re just an American main crying because we should have some of your vehicles.
Moving your HQ to Budapest doesn’t make them a Hungarian company lmfao.
funnily enough u could change that to, moving the KF41 to Hungary doesnt make it a Hungarian Vehicle either lmao
Britain has nothing to do with the AIM. It belongs in the US tree.
Australia is in the commonwealth so it should be.
Australian domestic vehicles can go to the British tree but the M1A1 AIM is not an Australian domestic vehicle. The US tree has been watered down enough. It doesn’t need to be watered down more because other trees don’t build competitive vehicles.
Britain builds competent vehicles, gaijin just hates us
Chally 2 is superior to Abrams in many respects. They just couldnt be bothered to finish it in game.
I doubt Gaijin hates Australia more than the average Australian. Just look at our governments…and Qantas…
It has absolutely nothing to do with who designed the vehicle, and everything to do with whose forces it’s used with/representing. The M1A1 AIM is used by Australians, and labelled as Australian in the game. All Australian vehicles should be in the one tech tree so we can play our vehicles together, and in War Thunder that tree is Great Britain.
Otherwise we can just remove all of WW2 tier China right now, and basically all of Israel… Finland will also need to be removed from the Swedish tree. Most of Hungary, sorry Italy someone thinks Hungarian armed forces don’t exist, you can’t have ANY of their post war tanks as none of them are indigenous.
Fairly certain a lot of US tech is heavily reliant on BAE systems. So, I think that means the UK has a claim on most “US” tech :P
Come on, comparing the Mustang to the M1A1 is laughable. The US actually used the Mustang. The British don’t use the Abrams.
Ok, show me a picture of a single British unit using the M1A1 and they can have it.
Please show us a single picture of a US tanker using an Australian Abrams.
If the country of origin gets the export vehicle. Then Britain should get the Hunter F58 found on the German tree.
Or the vehicle goes to importers nation location. I.e Australia is commonwealth and is part of the Uk tree, therefore Abrams could and should be part of the UK
tree.
The issue is that the rules change and seem to change specifically to keep vehicles off the Uk tree.
What we are asking for above all else is consistency
The AIM is in US service. The SA is built by the US for Australia.
If the Australians built the M1A1, like the Indians built the T90S, then you might have a reason for it to be in the British tree, but they don’t.
bc they put wieners on their tanks bro
Are you sure? I think you meant india
MiseryIndex556 you’re trying to make the same points I’ve already refuted, please give us a valid reason why the Australian tank should not be in the same tech tree as other Australian forces.