Yeah that too, not a clue why though, probably just needed some sort of assault gun that Australia couldn’t really offer.
1 Like
I’ve started integrating the M113s and LP1 carrier in to the suggestion (specs added for a couple so far). I hope you don’t mind I used the websites and images you provided links to.
And for my own personal reference for when I get to doing the tech tree images, I plan on putting the M113A1 106mm RCL at BR 7.3, I looked at the other tanks in game using the gun and quite frankly it’d be one of the best. Australian M113A1s had a more powerful 300hp engine, so the power to weight is actually going to be decent. The two closest were the T114 (BR 7.7) which has similar armour protection but less crew, while having a worse power to weight ratio it also has a very good reload speed. Then there was the SPz 12-3 LGS (BR 6.7) which has worse armour, worse mobility. The only thing going for it really is the 20mm but the M113A1 still has a fiddy cal, so I can see it being a higher BR than the SPz while, despite the better mobility and the slight increase in survivability vs the T114, the reload speed will not put it above or even equal with that.
I still need to double check the engine specs and what not of our M125A1s before making a call on the MILAN carrier. It could be similar to the Giraf at 8.3. Also depends on our model MILAN which I forget right now.
Edit: Looks like we had the MILAN 1.
Edit 2: The M113A1 106mm RCL, M125A1 MILAN and LP1 Carrier 2-pdr have now been added to the suggestion. I went with BR 8.3 for the M125A1, it has a worse missile than the two I-TOW equipped M113s but it also has a better engine, so…I guess it’s reasonably close enough to put it at the same BR in the suggestion.
1 Like
I’ve just put in my Honourable Mentions section to the op. I may add to it, but for now I’m happy with what I’ve got in there.
Just checked some of the sources you’ve linked and found some more Aussie vehicles, one named the ASLAV Armour-Dillo. Looks pretty interesting, perhaps similar performance to the Russian 2S23 Nona?
The mortar it used was the Royal Ordnance 120mm
4 Likes
I’ve discussed the 120mm mortar on the forums with others before and unfortunately it just doesn’t seem like we have any evidence of a round that could be useful in the game for it. Even the best 120mm mortar rounds in all of NATO today would barely pass as usable in the game.
That is a shame, all I can find is a HE round but no specific information on its penetration, explosive mass, etc.
:(
From memory right now they are around 2-3kg TNT.
Best you’re gonna get are the Swedish STRIX and THOR rounds, as I believe we have discussed before. STRIX due to its HEAT warhead and THOR due to its almost 5kg of TNT. Both of these rounds would be very strange to see on an Australian vehicle, of course, and there may need to be some unhistorical concessions made for the STRIX performance wise.
There’s also a German prototype guided 120mm mortar round called the Bussard/Buzzard, which features a HEAT warhead. Like the STRIX, it’s meant to be fired in an arc and guided down onto a target, however, the HEAT warhead should still function as normal if used in a direct fire role. It also required a laser designation for guidance, so it should perform like any other dumb round if fired without a designation. This round was also modified and entered into the PGMM XM395 program but was not adopted.
It’s also worth noting that Soviet 120mm gun/mortars are supposedly compatible with NATO 120mm mortar rounds. Ukraine allegedly puts American M1101 120mm HE mortar rounds through captured 2S23 Nona-SVKs. This means that there is a chance that NATO gun/mortars could fire Soviet 120mm mortar rounds, which, includes ones with HEAT warheads. Of course, there’s no direct proof of this and it would still be strange to find Soviet ammunition on NATO vehicles.
It’s really up to how much Gaijin wants gun/mortars in the game.
1 Like
New SPAA? It seems to mount twin Oerlikon 20mm cannons
FORT GELLIBRAND, WILLIAMSTOWN, VIC. 1943-01-26. A TWIN 20-MM. GUN MOUNTED ON A TRACK BEING FIRED … | Australian War Memorial
Was tested at the same time and location as the 40mm Bofors vehicle we already know
FORT GELLIBRAND, WILLIAMSTOWN, VIC. 1943-01-26. AN AUSTRALIAN-MADE ANTI-AIRCRAFT GUN BEING TESTED … | Australian War Memorial
I also found another source for the M113 106mm RCL, in which an ammunition count of 16 is stated
Bonus image(s)
Spoiler
Captured anti-aircraft truck and technical by 1 RAR in Somalia, Operation Solace 1993
Unit History – 2nd / 4th Battalion Royal Australian Regiment Association
3 Likes
Give it to sweden +1
Awesome find, I will definitely include the 20mm 3-ton, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was a Canadian mount, they had twin, triple and quad mounts for them.
Not sure about the truck from Somalia, it’s a neat bit of history but maybe not for the tech tree.
3 Likes
To be honest, 16 rounds plus presumably 1 in the chamber at the start of battle making for 17 total is pretty decent for a 106mm RCL vehicle. Although some which are designated “SPGs” get the ammo box now.
And maybe the 20mm cannons aren’t Canadian Oerlikons, going by all the pictures for ground and naval mounts here on this webpage, the gunner is behind the guns while on the truck in the Australian photo, the gunner appears to be seated beside the guns?
Edit: They might be Polsten 20mm.
1 Like
But they will be under the US sub-tree right :). I mean the Brits will be getting everything then, US weapons, Soviet weapons, German weapons. Kinda need to spread the vehicles around for other nations too. Otherwise, I am all for it.
I never included this in the suggestion, a Vickers Light AA, because even though this is on the AWM website, I’m not sure these were Australian forces or not. Could just be a British photo on the website.
Edit: I decided today I will also include a towed Bofors. We already have trailer physics in the game, and it will give another low BR SPAA. I can see it being lower than the truck mounted Bofors guns since it will lose a lot of anti tank capability with the difficulty of maneuvering the trailer, but it will still retain good if not even better anti air capability. I say better since the driver is in a different vehicle to the gun trailer, which will make it harder to kill in a single strafing run from an aircraft.
This is not the best picture, hopefully I can find a better one.
I almost forgot about adding the 20mm truck and towed Bofors. Of course I remember this when I don’t have time for it. But I just want to leave this here as well, thanks @John_Sneeeeeeeew for pointing this one out to me. Supacat 6x6 from Australian unmanned experiments with a what looks like EOS R400 weapon station, 30mm Bushmaster, Javelin ATGM and APKWS rockets on the back. Remotely operated but maybe a person could still drive it and sit in it, the seats look like they’re still there. I know too little about it to include it in the tree right now though.
4 Likes
corect me if i am wrong wasn’t there a matilda with a new zeland 3inc gun
A pair of Matilda IIs from C squadron, 2/9 Armoured Regiment engaging a Japanese position. Both have been fitted with spare track links for extra armor. The tank in the foreground is armed with a 3’’ (76.2 mm) howitzer while the tank behind is armed with a 2 pounder. 11th June 1945 Tarakan, Borneo – Source: Australian War Memorial
And a few different aslav varients such as one with 2 TOW launchers on the side and a aslav with a 120mm mortor
The Matilda CS with the 3in gun is already in the suggested tree, as is the TOW launching ASLAV. The mortar armed ASLAV is not however as there is no ammunition for it that would make it viable, certainly nothing Australia would have tested on it.
Ok, cheers
I think the Australian Army used M7 Priests btw, might be a good add to the tree? Perhaps Rank 2, Br 3.3 ?
I had this discussion with someone just a couple weeks ago, I’ve found nothing to suggest we did use the M7.
1 Like