I would rather keep it at 8.0 and instead see it reload buffed a lot, and have the HORRIBLE aim dead zone above the hatch looked at.
The ammo works very well when it has the 2.0 second reload of the light tank at 9.0. VT shells also very nice.
It seems it’s balanced around the VCC 60/30 and the HVG is left with nothing, i’m fairly sure the reload on the HVG is a lot faster in reality and it makes no sense for it to be slower than WW2 tanks with projectiles several times it’s weight in even smaller spaces, I smell like just more Gaijin nonsense to have the reload be this slow…
1 Like
It really just needs an ammo buff because it’s unusable like that.
Of course I’ve tried it, but to no avail.
1 Like
Yeah well, what more can you do? It’s clearly screwed because of the VCC being implemented, which also just shows how shell performance and spalling is entirely made up and adjusted at a whim.
1 Like
Idk, I just don’t have much hope for such bug reports submitted as suggestions. Btw does your bug report contain any real life sources like that brochure with spalling measured?
Spoiler
No, It’s more from a gameplay perspective that it’s just unplayable.
Plus I doubt they’d accept a brochure as source anyways, you know how absurd it is to get any sources accepted, that’s why people feel forced to use classified documents.
1 Like
Except for the Russians, if you use as a source a YouTube video made by a retarded child drunk on propaganda they accept it for you, I’m not kidding, it really happened.
This is actually a video from the manufacturer, would be same as to use a video from Leonardo page for Italian stuff. Although it’s submitted as a suggestion.
Too bad: “You Tube is not a reliable source of information” words of the developers of Gaijin… If you try to do the same thing with any NATO vehicle you get the answer I wrote, and they don’t accept the source but if you do it with a Russian vehicle then everything is fine this in my house is called “Russian bias”
And there are several more embarrassing examples where Gaijin accepts videos on YuoTube always for Russian vehicles, the one I used above is just one of many examples.
EDIT: Fixed typo
Since when are videos allowed as source? They dismiss documentation of the company that produce the weapon as not a primary source, but a video is good enough for Russia?
1 Like
Idk probably because of exact value mentioned, unlike for Ariete tanks hull composite for example.
PS since it nerfs autoloader protection I guess bias works a different way this time XD
@Smin1080p_WT is it within rules that bug report can be submited using video as a source, even if as suggestion?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/dfgYXDZWTKOd