does it still have no radar in the dev server? Havent checked the dev server in a while
Haven’t got this dev installed, plus I’m currently at work
Do they have any pods to use together?
But to drop it more accurately it is better to have a pod or build in optics to aim to the place where to drop rather than lock on 3rd person which requires to fly closely as well as mark in the minimap right?
5 Likes
and with partial MY subtree is getting in, a reshuffle from previous one, for T-50i and FA-50M maybe wait and see until Korean tree is added but yeah these should fill in, yes CA-27 is in both MY and ID but perhaps prioritize to MY and give MiG-17PF for ID
also not sure should CA-27 be 9.0 with AIM-9B or 8.7 without it (given compatibility consideration). Plus it’ll be F-30 with better engine and AIM-9B from F-40 if it does go for 9.0
3 Likes
damn, no su-27skm love?
Damn. No OV-10F love either
1 Like
*Lim-5p, and it’s rank 6 not rank 5. Realistically the best option is either the T.55 or the T-33A, Japan has a T.55 i think so that leaves the T-33. Though a CS-102 with a single 23mm seems to also be a decent choice
I’d argue the Indonesian one is a bit more unique since it has access to SURA-D rockets
Here’s a list ~75 total vehicle to choose from
2 Likes
I would also add that you can make the argument that the CL-41G would go to tier IV since it’s very similar to the Strikemaster Mk.88
Though you can make the argument that the Lim-5P, as well as the Lim-5 can be put into Tier V based on the fact that there’s are vehicles from the same family or even the same vehicle being placed in Different Tier’s in different TT’s. An example of this is the ZSU-57’s. The Israeli ZSU-57 is tier IV while the rest are at Tier V. Another example is the Cent Mk.3, the British version being at Tier IV while the Strv-81, it’s Swedish counterpart is Tier V. The F6F-5N is a third example, the American one being Tier III while the French one being Tier IV. You can find more examples if you looked around but that should give you an idea on what i’m talking about
Do I agree with these? No. All I’m saying that there that if the Lim-5 and/or Lim-5P is added to the JP TT, there’s a chance that it would be Tier V instead of Tier VI since we already have a precedent for inconsistent Tier placement between TT’s for various reasons
1 Like
this update being rushed?!
well I never
disappointing really,
I wonder why the radome is painted differently…🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔Surely its because there’s nothing there!
its not like we have photos of the radar or anything…
its funny because every ID vehicle that was introduced had (and still has btw) issues with them. Marvelous
Gaijin? Rushing a Major WT update?
Never heard of that one before
On a more serious note. It was indeed a letdown but it’s expected
I also love how the MKM can have KH38s but the Hawk 209 can’t have 4xATGMs, 3xAShMs, or 6xAAMs.
1 Like
oh yea you’re right! tho I’d think the 13.0 Su-27SK tho, not sure for 13.7 Su-27SKM. I bet those people gonna cry copy paste even louder with that.
Avoiding F-5E for same reason too plus Thai ones are the best version apart of 3 operators
F-15IDN, KF-21, and Kaan shall be on hold right now since there’s little progress or still in early stages for them.
OV-10F and Super Tucano, probably BR close as A2D Skyshark (OV-10 BR could be same as Wyvern?) (though both would lose AIM-9 for balancing and given how gaijin treat turboprops)
Lim-5P is 8.7, that is still within Rank 5 BR. It’s on Rank 6 in USSR and German tree because their Rank 5 on the line ended with MiG-15bis. If they add CS-102 it still can be in Rank 5 after that. Given how the tree is right now not sure if they can add Il-28 on 4th line as they already messed up 5th line straight to fighters and potentially full MY subtree, if they did add it on 4th line or add T-33A then Lim-5P can be bring down to Rank 6.
About CA-27 Sabre, yes they could add for ID line but then there’s nothing to fill in MY line after CL-41G if they choose only 1 line gets CA-27, I doubt they give both lines the same jet even another line has extra rocket variety.
For F-16, best to look which BR it could fill, best probably 12.3 with AIM-9P-4 F-16A, or if they crazy enough, 12.7 with AIM-9P-5 (because somehow Belgian F-16 at French tree can get IRCCM at 12.7 just because it didn’t have SARH missile and no HMD). For ones above 13.0 it’s either already filled by Thai F-16A OCU, or add in SIngaporean F-16D+ (that is suspiciously look like F-16I)
Singapore still is a wild card here as they can be at any tech tree, but the F.75 Hunter, A-4SU and F-16D+ might be possible.
F-16AJ could be replaced by F-16A OCU as the OCU never had AMRAAMS and the AJ is probably next on the chopping block. It’d be like the 12.7 Belgian OCU, having 6x IRCCM.
2 Likes
yeah ngl personally MiG-29 almost had it but they insist for RVV-AE on it so only another F-16 that would replace the AJ. *Also Indo OCU tho so not to confuse with Thai OCU (which should be renamed to MLU)
It can be either, the Thai OCU never used AMRAAMS and the MLU is an entirely different model.
1 Like