Really seems like they got it pretty well. Nice to see they’re putting in this level of effort.
1 Like
Its a Mig 29 so how good will it be? I rarely see these in Air are they good or are there limits. Ground pounding seems to be an issue no good anti armor weapons.
oh yea right, it used to carry ACMI pod as well, I forgot about that one. IIRC it’s a locally made version and used to train alongside the Hawks.
plus the Hawk 208 squadron was stationed at the same airbase as MiG-29 so R&D may be done in tandem.
1 Like
Ive got sad news a second mod denied it as they personally believe its for another variant of the mig and not the N aka the SE/SD internationally
1 Like
I hope they can publish their sources, it would be interesting to see if it really used N019ME.
I just closed my own report yesterday because sources contradicted eachother, so this would mean they might have additional information.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/OwzmAUQu1fg5
1 Like
13.3, yep instant DOA
(it was nice until this happen) (also I blame MatAWG because he’s the one insist for R-77 on this)
like, just make it 12.7 with AIM-9L, and F-16AJ finally have reason to be removed
4 Likes
Well, to be fair Japan lacks a 13.3 but I agree that this shouldn’t be it, also I don’t think the AJ is going anywhere anytime soon lol
So with the confirmation on Indonesia and Malaysia as subtrees for Japan, there are suddenly so many options now, even some that are not in the suggeston.
Indonesian Rafale, future Thai Gripen E and maybe, just maybe future Indonesian f-15idn, 2 more versions of T-50, indonesian su-27 and su-30mk2( i guess the same as the premium Venezuelan one), i think there are some A-4 too
Suddenly a lot of cas options too
1 Like
Mostly yes, but Indonesia can use domestic P series dumb bombs for them which make it at least a bit more unique.
There’s also BNT-250 NATO style bombs as domestic Mk.82 alternative and even a GPS guoded version called B 250 ST
3 Likes
could be a big find
this image shows a finless TGM-65K2 (training version of the AGM-65) mounted on the inner hardpoint of the Hawk 209. Surely if a training version can be fitted so can a live version?
EDIT: it seems it has fins, just very blurry because of the image quality
closer look of a TGM-65K2 on an F-16 (?) (white stripe front, two blue behind it)
4 Likes
less that more the lighting on the fin matches the wet pavement below, either way the plane behind has a Maverick in the same exact place with a much more obvious fin
2 Likes
does it still have no radar in the dev server? Havent checked the dev server in a while
Haven’t got this dev installed, plus I’m currently at work
Do they have any pods to use together?
But to drop it more accurately it is better to have a pod or build in optics to aim to the place where to drop rather than lock on 3rd person which requires to fly closely as well as mark in the minimap right?
5 Likes
and with partial MY subtree is getting in, a reshuffle from previous one, for T-50i and FA-50M maybe wait and see until Korean tree is added but yeah these should fill in, yes CA-27 is in both MY and ID but perhaps prioritize to MY and give MiG-17PF for ID
also not sure should CA-27 be 9.0 with AIM-9B or 8.7 without it (given compatibility consideration). Plus it’ll be F-30 with better engine and AIM-9B from F-40 if it does go for 9.0