AS90 - Technical data and discussion

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
1

AS90 self-propelled gun

image
image1113×483 145 KB

X-Ray View

image
image1149×505 214 KB

image
image1001×462 203 KB

**Stat card

image

Modifications

image

Tree Placement

image
image1591×295 94.6 KB

Bug reports

AS90 missing L15 HE Proxy Fuse shell

[DEV] AS-90 missing Torque Converter

[DEV] AS-90 track speed mismatched to movement speed

[DEV] AS-90 incorrect engine sound

[DEV] AS-90 Incorrect Engine Horsepower

[DEV] AS-90 Main gun name Incorrect

[DEV] AS-90 Name Incorrect

[DEV] AS-90 Top speed incorrect

[DEV] AS90 sustained rate of fire too high

[DEV] AS90 Sight FOV too small

[DEV] AS90 too many crew

[DEV] AS90 Machine gun projectiles originating from wrong point

[DEV] AS90 Machine gun name incorrect

[DEV] AS-90 fume extrator smoke location

[DEV] AS-90 - Incorrect reload/fire rate (3 second burst)

[DEV] AS-90 - Missing infrared sight (revised)

[DEV] AS90 FCS shouldnt disable gun operation

[DEV] AS90 Hydraulic pump is not a hydraulic pump

[DEV] AS90 Hydraulic elevation ram incorrect shape

[DEV] AS90 | Engine sound

[DEV] AS90 ammorack use order

3 Likes
2

Updated post 05/03/2026 - Xray model updated as well as statcard+tech tree image, model appears to be almost finished (however is including an FCS module that shouldnt be present). Only reload rate/ 1st stage ammunition requires implementation before the vehicle appears to be ready to ship

3

absolutely chugging through these reports, you’ll have to update this frequently

If anyone here has a source for the AS-90 please throw it my way

1 Like
4

let me know whenever youve done more of them, either here or discord and ill add them to the list

5

there’s already a new one lol

will probably hold back on a weight report, not got a reliable figure

could get it as low as 39.5 ton

in any case, 45 ton is the largest combat mass i’ve seen, it can only go down

1 Like
6

added

7

Can you add the stat card for this thing?

1 Like
8

[DEV] AS90 too many crew

might throw it at the wall and see if it sticks, but it won’t be my priority for now, i have no confidence it would go through

9

image
image

1 Like
10

done

1 Like
11
2 Likes
12

The first round is already loaded, firing it starts the clock so 10/2=5.

1 Like
13

All sources state 3 rounds in under 10 seconds, so at most it should be a four second reload

1 Like
14

footage i found to find an accurate ROF had 3 shells (first loaded) in 9.3 seconds. 5 second reload is fine

15

Firstly, ROF is typically given with the breach loaded, so:

T=0s, First shot is fired
T=5s, 2nd shot is fired
T=10s, 3rd shot is fired

Which makes a 5s reload correct.

Secondly, your source contradicts itself as later in the page (the more info section), by stating “3 rounds/ 10 seconds” or 3 rounds in 10 seconds.
image

1 Like
16

Its actually capable of 3 rounds in 9.2 seconds based on this footage, so an ace crew reload of 4.6 seconds is the very best i think it could ever be. making 5 seconds more than adequate:

image
image1181×664 148 KB

1 Like
17

I was just giving an example of the ROF given the 3 rounds in 10 seconds figure.

1 Like
18

I just found that footage really cool.

Im really excited to bonk some tiger 2s with an L15a2, maybe some planes with an L15a2(pf) too if my accepted report is actioned.

1 Like
19

Eh, I kinda burned myself out on 155mm SPHs with the Type 75. I’m just waiting for Abbot or something smol like it (RO2001 for example)

2 Likes
20

fair enough. I havent played many SPHs other than M109 and G6, M109 was mid as its traverse is poor and the velocity was meh when im usually in an APDS shell shatter machine, G6 was great fun but the chassis its on held it back.

GBT and AS90 fix my issues with the 109 and g6 and are very fun on the dev server, with the 5 and 10 second reloads they both feel perfectly fine.

They already have the hull modelled; they have teased us for years. Abbot, sexton and other funny smaller bonk gun vehicles ill enjoy a lot

2 Likes