Armor that does not exist on Russian tanks

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
21

No, I think it’s a big problem. This would cause the armor to be penetrated by the dm53, with the loader behind it. And when they submitted the report, they met the reporting requirements perfectly, but he was directly not a bug.

22

And there is evidence that 99a has more than 700 ke or even more than 800 ke. He denied it with an unverifiable form.

23

Just buy out the gaijin and improve the game, because if someone still hasn’t noticed, wt turns into a card for the Russian army

24

5 primary sources = not enough proof for a Western MBT

Drawing on a napkin = immediate hotfix for RU TT.

3 Likes
25

Yes, but I think all the vehicles are a little unreasonable.

  1. The fuel tanks of Japanese cars, Chinese cars and French cars are all fatal weaknesses, but Russian cars don’t have to worry too much.

  2. American, British and French tank body armor looks too weak. I mean weakness. China tanks have just been weakened. I didn’t say Japanese cars because they have four seconds to load. And, uh … Type 90, why can’t I kill it?

  3. It seems that the Leopard tank is not equipped with new armor. Will this threaten Swedish tanks?

  4. The loading speed of China tanks is usually 7.1 seconds. These tanks have no reliable armor and insufficient firepower, which seems to be deliberately targeted. Mobility? Come on, the mobility of modern tanks is not much different.
    I bought MBT2000 gift package, and I was scared. Anyway, it’s a dead end. I just want to hide in the bunker … I bought it because of 99A, and now;(
    Not only China tanks, the loading time of T72, T90 and T80B is 7.1 seconds. Why not 6.5 seconds?
    Another thing that puzzles me is the loading time in abrams … is it because American loaders are strong?

5.Italian tanks have been forgotten…

2 Likes
26

I mean: Although the repair of the defective armored area on t80 and t90 mentioned in issue has little effect on vehicle performance, gaijin can admit the problem in the face of sufficient evidence, and it doesn’t matter whether it is repaired or not. However, the auditor directly denied the problem.
However, the issue about weakening 99a. Even if there is no direct evidence, it can be passed only by loose speculation. This has to make people feel that auditors treat vehicles from different countries differently.

1 Like
27

Generous armor estimates are always made for Russian vehicles. But NATO ones? Nooooo… they could never do such a thing…

1 Like