The lack of ever being used? Lol if that was a real weapon we would have been made aware of it. But its fake a Gaijin coping on the Russians again
1 Like
14 Likes
What?
Too many people sadly believe that.
They’re militant in it wanting to stay despite not having evidence to back their beliefs, and they’re militant on wanting it removed despite not having evidence to back their beliefs.
Then there’s me, I have zero claims about the missile personally. I have zero interest in it being in the game or not because I only ever used it for air sim convoy hunting, and custom battle testing.
Even if the Kh-38MT stayed it’d have its seeker nerfed and be unusable in air sim anyway.
So no matter what the Kh-38MT is a dead missile to me, so I have no skin in the argument of it staying or going.
Dude, you’re not making any sense.
You made some claims, and were asked to back them up.
I explicitly stated there’s no evidence of the weapon being in service.
And you’re getting mad that I stated that? Really?
I can’t prove there’s no evidence when there’s no such thing as evidence of no evidence.
And the only other things in my posts are me repeating another person’s post which has a Chinese export document, which isn’t my claim.
@Just_Baron @PyroAddict @HOMINUSNOCTURNO-live @PaulsBackPack @Neekolodian73029 @Leinadmix9_ツ @MikeyPlayzonYT
Thank you all for coming to agree with us about Kh-38MT’s lack of evidence.
Glad we’re all on the same page.
???
Take your medication, Alvis. I’m being dead serious.
And don’t tag me if i’m not interacting with you at all.
p. s. I don’t care about the missile other than its removal or a nerf to drag it into a leveled field.
4 Likes
Dude, all I see is us agreeing there’s no evidence of functional Kh-38MTs being put on service aircraft.
If there’s no evidence of
Then there’s no evidence of such missile working at all.
By the logic you’re appealing to, the US has a hypersonic cruise missile, it just lacks the evidence of being used on different platforms.
Alvis just ragebaited everyone and you all fell for it lmaooo
3 Likes
No. I won’t play those games with you.
You made specific claims. You are being asked to back them up.
You said, and I quote :
There’s cirumstantial evidence china tested them
That is vastly different to the reality, in which some mockups were at an air show and mounted to an aircraft. That’s not tesing, that’s sales.
3 Likes
There’s a difference between rage and calling out false claims. :)
You don’t get it? He initially defended the existence of the Kh-38MT, got people riled up, posted a reply agreeing with them, and then deleted the earlier defenses. I’m normally against ragebaiting but that was just funny. The fact he @'d everyone too lmao
He doesn’t do this. He’s very much extremely serious at all times. Consider that when you read his posts.
7 Likes
As @SwingfireOP said, there’s a difference between ragebaits and false claims.
there’s ALSO a difference between ragebaits and sowing misinformation.
I don’t see rage, I see him trolling and making false claims, which I always push back on.
I reserve my rage exclusively for gaijin and people who chew with their mouths open.
Well whatever he did, it was hilarious. Not because he’s entertaining, but because how ridiculous it is.
I’m very much well aware.
Same and real.
1 Like
huh neat. Anywho, sense theres basically nothing about its seeker head. Would this be a bug report type of problem or a passed to developers type of thing?
1 Like
A bug report could be tried, but I’m fairly sure it would be rejected as the only source is a marketing brochure.
The irony isn’t lost on me.
2 Likes