Don’t forget about this goober
4 Likes
X - Doubt. The late 1940s? What kind of alternate WW2 TL is this? 😁
1 Like
well you can still add it as a separate vehicle to the B2, like you did with the fw a5 :) (and yes we’re all aware that you refuse to add it to the tree to force players to buy it if they want to play it)
1 Like
jets are actually a prewar theory and most nation started to experiment with the technology prior to the war if i’m not mistaking.
Can we possible see the Ar 234 B-2/N as a tech tree variant?
So there is also a gun armed B variant of the Ar 234 that is available for research.
1 Like
Indeed, many more to come too!
Spoiler
Messerschmitt Me P.1101 - Suggestions - Devs / Passed - War Thunder — official forum
Messerschmitt Me 262 HGII - Suggestions / Aircraft - War Thunder — official forum
I’m getting info on the Me 263 and Me 163C currently I’m building up enough to make suggestions
3 Likes
The Arado model is old, but ok, as it was updated in 1.45. I would count models from 1.41 onward acceptable, as I’ve been looking and tracking model updates for a while now and the models pre-1.41 are in much more dire need for model reworks.
So this is where we’re at now? Just turning ordnance options into copy+paste variants.
What’s next? Premium M1 Abrams (M833)?
10 Likes
This is a new low. This should have been a modification. This is a very dangerous precedent.
9 Likes
With the new damage model, the Arado 234 B-2 (WB 151) becomes an extremely effective strike aircraft for all game modes.
Huh what a funny thing to say, especially regarding NF where the devs just recently nerfed every other nations jet bomber capabilities in that mode by forcing them outside the BR range (9.3) by sneaking a change in last second without consultation to the community (of course excluding the event bombers from nuclear thunder event in april), now OFC it’s effective when it’s the only one (TT/premium) god damnit.
This is nothing new
Just look at the F-14D, Netz (mod), NF-5A, MiG-15bis ISh, Su-39 or even the Vautour IIN(c)
the others are valid although the ISH does have unique structural modifications. At least a premium F-16 is worth it’s price rather than a 50 dollar bomber that can’t even destroy a base
1 Like
How is it valid to sell premiums that are straight upgrades compared to their TT counterparts?
2 Likes
ju288c allover again. Rip german teams
It can’t possibly be worth the price surely, AC8 is £65 for a whole game Vs a singular mid tier plane, a bit of ge and some premium time for £49.99.
5 Likes
this is such a stupid decision by Gaijin, their reasoning is totally braindead. the flakpanzer 341 was also given it’s better cannons and rounds and they had to bump it up a lot in br. so why not the arado 234?
2 Likes
Most players don’t have the Coelian and will never be able to acquire it, that’s the difference
I’m not saying it’s valid to sell those, I’m saying it’s valid to criticize them. My bad
2 Likes
Oh, aight
Fair
many premiums are copy-paste of TT (or vice versa) - Plaigis Spitfire and M-10 Achilles (17 pdr) come immediately to mind without checking the game for more
1 Like