Please read it, as it adds value to the conversation and can give you an informed idea of the issues at hand. But yeah, as stated in the title, the Abrams M1A2 Sep v2 should have APS. It’s a disservice to not add it.
Bro has a negative K/D in the 11.7 Abrams tanks, if they can’t do well in tanks like those I don’t expect them to be able to format texts.
2 Likes
If you come to a forum, i expect better literary skills than from a 2nd grader.
By now the trophy APS has been bugged for 10 months so its interception rate is 0%. Meanwhile the other APS in game have 100% rate actually.
1 Like
It’s definitely an intentional design. Why fix anything for other nations when we have yet another t34 to add? Literally gaijin logic. So many broken things in this game that don’t get paid any attention by the devs because it’s not the favored country.
Look up ad hominem fallacy. It’s actually a very interesting and pertains directly to what these Russian bots do in every thread.
Crazy how predictable people are.
1 Like
Shoot actually I don’t think there’s been any facts provided by these fellas. It’s just been completely irrelevant and useless opinions.
Great way to get everyone to hate you if you’re openly negative towards everyone responding to your post.
Everyone’s first language may not be English, or he didn’t have the time to write a perfect text
1 Like
My first language isn’t english either, that has nothing to do with formatting a text.
And if he didn’t have the time to press enter a few times, maybe he shouldn’t have posted at all.
Once again irrelevant and trivial. Still waiting to hear an honest and well thought out counter argument, but you seem to be incapable of creating one. Truly not my problem if you just make the conscious decision to not read.
Your problem, not mine 🤷🏼♂️ but please keep making a fool of yourself, I’m laughing at you 🤡
You are whining about US suffering and Russian bias while the US is pretty competitive at top tier.
Which makes that insecurity part pretty ironic, since you would rather blame the game than look at yourself.
Why should we argue facts when most of the original post in this thread was opinions.
Opinion
Opinion/speculation
Opinion
Opinion
Opinion
Etc.
1 Like
Still waiting for a well thought out and valid argument on why the Abrams should not receive APS… if you’re capable of that I mean, and that’s completely up to you to decide. Be a part of the discussion or remain useless
Also this is a fact, get it right next time 😂
Yes please fight to get the Trophy system on Abrams, you have my full support. It maybe get fixed after all the US mains whine about it not working.
I am curious as to how you think this will help in game. I mean a side from probably being incorrectly modeled to disable the entire tanks electrical system when it gets destroyed, even if the main engine is still running.
That depends if you want people to bother reading what you wrote or not.
That would be likely be a separate tank as trophy was a later addition to SEP V2, not part of the original upgrade, same with the SEP V3.
1 Like
You got your feelings hurt so you flagged my post? Must’ve struck a cord there, huh? 😂✌🏻
Like clockwork 😂 bunch of 🤡
From what I’ve read, APU systems may be added into the game and may actually be a functioning mechanic. And the sep v3 has internal as opposed to the optional external package found in earlier models.
It’s words on a screen, yes it’s trivial to bring up formatting, and it was also my first post so learning as I go. Honestly to anyone that wants to complain about it, get over it. If people bring up formatting I’m just going to think they are a joke. It’s a rather lazy attempt at derailment.
I would be ok with that if they actually added it in, but currently top tier is plagued by IR guided AGM’s. It’s pretty abysmal when in the first 5 minutes, someone is in their mi 28nm and is flinging lmur’s from behind a mountain and the two best aa’s are usually on the other team along with them.
I will make this comparison, why did the t80 receive thermals when only a few were equipped with them later on? It was most likely to keep those tanks competitive. So I ask why we can’t do the same for the sep v2 since we already know it was tested on that model tank for future use? I have been waiting for someone to give me a solid counter argument for why it should not?
And please correct me if I’m wrong. I’m tired and going off the top of my head on the things I’ve read about from various different sources.
If things don’t work in game then that’s another issue completely. Maybe we should ask gaijin why things aren’t getting fixed after what I can only assume is an immense amount of bug reports