Anti-Radiation Missiles - Technical data and discussion

As far as wikipedia tells me, there is:

KH-28

Spoiler

(Kh-28 - Wikipedia)
image
The first soviet anti-radiation missile

KH-31

Spoiler

(Kh-31 - Wikipedia)
image
Many different variants, anti-rad one has a range of 110km, and can ship with one of 3 different seekers for different radar bands

KH-54

Spoiler

(Kh-58 - Wikipedia)
image
Older missile, chunky, many variants with massively varying range, modernised over time

R27P/EP

Spoiler

(R-27 (air-to-air missile) - Wikipedia)
image
Its the R27 you already know, now with a passive seeker! 72 and 110km ranges respectively.

And the KH-25s detailed above

Though I doubt we’d see any for a long time due to their relatively massive ranges. AGM-45(a) shrike and AGM-122 SIDEARM are both very close range missiles (no more than 16km it appears), and the firing aircraft would be susceptible to already-in-game SPAA

2 Likes

You got the two that I mentioned above, one has a maximum range of 10km.

ah, welp there ya go then

See this bit

If you have data on Soviet missiles that you want to share (particularly what radar bands they cover), then post it here.

2 Likes

i doubt those exist

Pantsir players laugh in the background

2 Likes

i stand corrected

Meanwhile me in my stormer HVM with over 2000 air kills

1 Like

Well that has ap missiles so

I think you are thinking of the ADATS. I dont think the Stormer can kill much more than maybe an APC with a very well aimed shot.

With the RWR rework coming next patch I think ARMs might be a step closer. Gaijin are actually making radar bands matter now (they’ve always existed but never really done much).

They are also modelling RWR capability based on whole radar bands rather than specific frequency ranges, which is how I suggest ARMs should be added.

7 Likes

To add to this some of the RWRs list specific threat types that aren’t in game such as Hawk, S-75, 2K11, And then there is S-125 but that’s on the Destroyer Bravy.

This leads me to believe that they are planning on adding more comprehensive SAM systems to modes like ARB and SIM which could compliment the introduction of something like ARMs very well.

2 Likes

Vietnam pilots discussing the AGM-45 Shrike and specifically ‘lofting’ it to increase range


F105 performing a 45+ degree loft of a Shrike

4 Likes

Well that is one hell of an aggressive loft. Or there is a radar on the moon that they’re targeting. Haha

3 Likes

The issue is that the Seeker only has an FoV of about +/- 4 degrees so has a very small searched volume once it goes terminal so needs to be lofted the same way, one would shoot a basketball in order to ensure that the geometry works out.

There is a computer assisted launch mode (CCRP) though so it’s not as if they are lofting it by eye, most of the time.

4 Likes
  • International Defense Review 1985: Vol 18 Iss 5
Spoiler


5 Likes

I need it

@Flame2512

Found some data on the AGM-78

As per

The AGM-78A only covers the S band (NATO D though F band).

The AGM-78B,C & D cover 2.65 to 3.2, 4.8 to 5.3 GHz, and 8.8 to 9.6 GHz (S, C & X old band, so covers approximately E though I NATO, though depending on how things are modeled may erroneously include J band ) Which is similar to the AGM-45x-10 Broadband seeker, though does include a novel memory circuit / INS capability.

2 Likes

Is it possible AGM-45A & AGM-45B Shrike and AGM-78A ~ AGM-78C Standard ARM coming to this month ?

I felt there was something missing on the A-6 Intruder. Was a bit disappointed that it didn’t have access to the AGM 88 HARM.

Flying low and fast work fine to evade gun SPAA’s with radar and even better aginst gun SPAA with IRST, but against missile SPAA it doesn’t work so well and there’s no real direct counter to them.

With anti rad missiles it forces the a little bit smarter gameplay on the SPAA players and it gives planes a better fighting chance against them

1 Like