Welp, they asked for our feedback on improving the game LMAOOO
Here’s your survey results, boys!
Welp, they asked for our feedback on improving the game LMAOOO
Here’s your survey results, boys!
because Gaijin clearly did not learn anything just buy this shiny new premium will you and be quiet
*they asked for feedback that pats them on the back
Same like you
Chinese players’ community spend enormous effort to find unclassified imformations of VT-4 for them,and they just reply: not a bug
With a manual suspected classified from Thailand
Who just told us they “refuse” to receive classified sources?
I regret adding some funds to my Gcoin stash
Waiting for the typical “We have heard your frustration and intend to do nothing” response now.
Welcome to the club, China players.
We are on the same boat now.
I understand why they made the new forums now. The amount of clown reactions and confused emojis would be unparalelled lmao
The amount of times I would use " SkullEmote" would be significant lol.
and then get even more hatred if the 2A7V would be too strong just give it the 122s armor and say its for balance i and i think many others would be fine with it same for the Abrams we give it more armor because we dont have any values to go with
This, if you dont want to make the 2A7V a walking bunker, fine, but at least make it the same level as the 122B+ FFS!
“Just because the German Leopards CAN mount external armor doesn’t mean they did so we can’t add it!!”
hurriedly sweeps JAS39C from South Africa with Skyflash and AIM9M under the biggest rug
Will Gaijin Release Their Sources on Abrams Armor?
The entirety of the F-16AJ would like to have a word with the devs
@Smin1080p @Stona_WT if the devs have problems with the 2A7V pls just give it the 122s armor and say its for balance because atm it performce worse
i agree
Also what the heck is that reasoning for Abrams? When has there ever been a “Must be the production version” requirement on anything??
unite.
They’re clinging to a single source that said only 5 Abrams used DU armor in the hull. A source that has been proven to be outdated and flat out wrong.