If I say that they said this, even, to paraphrase, one of the project managers said this, then what? Will you change your mind like your shoes?
To be honest, i find quite fantastic the justification for adding 5 seconds reload ( Comparing a 105mm shell with a 120mm shell is not one of the best ideas, but oh well ) when its not really needed, we all know i think that an M1A2 IRL can load in 5 seconds without issues.
But then denying a bug report with 10 ( ten ) secondary sourced, based on 1 ( one ) secondary source about the reload rate of the Leclercs, this yes is quite depressing.
Leclerc ( All Variants ) wrong rate of fire // Gaijin.net // Issues
Spoiler

3-5 bug reports on the abrams hull armor alone and they said “Why we believe that hull armor was not reinforced on production vehicles.” Like, where does that extra 15 tons of weight come from? electronics that weight almost a ton each in the Abrams upgrade?
Seriously man.
We players gave you as accurate information as possible about the Leopard 2A7V, but you used documents from the last century to prove the armor of the 2017 Leopard 2A7V.
Why not make all 11.7 Russian tanks only capable of firing 3BM42, isn’t it a testament to history?
I will leave my personal comment on STEAM again and then uninstall the game.
How about China?
Where is China?
None of you developers even remember there’s a China ground TT? Or we don’t give you informations of Chinese tanks liners in issues? We do that FAR more than once!
Sorry, only Russia gets love
(also chinese air is anemic, where is the J-10 or the neat trainer/attackers?)
Russian bias, already get used to it
T-90M, yes!
ZTZ-99A, NO!
In a later version, I hope?? 30MM KE and 400MM CE are literally made up numbers and i’ve provided enough sources to prove that much.
Damnit gaijin.
“Answering your concerns”
Proceeds to make everyone more concerned
I’d say mad
I am kinda glad they are doing this… I almost considered doing some extra work commissions to spend 20 bucks this Christmas on the 180 Premium days again, but, honestly, any desire and possibility that I would do that vanished after this, so there goes an unnecessary expense I am saving for now.
And I had made a “tribute/appreciation” positive post a couple of days ago… lmfao
Defend 30mm autocannons=30mm KE
That’s just very GAIJIN, LOL
Talking to a brick wall mate, STANAG is alien to the devs for some reason
It’s not even 30mm autocannon tho.
It’s 25MM APFSDS protection, as per STANAG 5 protection :c
The 30 number is straight up fake and made up. There’s no evidence or claims ASPRO-HMT stops 30mm
“not a bug”
Yesterday I was about to get that 360 days of premium for the usual Christmas 50% off, but I hesitated and looks like my hesitation payed off. I will be spending that on a title that deserves my investment.
So the Abrams being one of the best battle proven MBTs in the world with a estimated KD of 11.5 to 1 is not going to get its DU upgrade because a Russian company said so…but they will use propaganda numbers for Russian MBTs. Makes sense.
They should have just stayed silent and let people think they might fix BR compression.
Very obvious the developers do not play their own game.
…the abrams were also fighting old crappy T-72Ms and T-62s, that’s not a comparison to make