You don’t believe the Abrams gained more armor but you did decide to randomly add tons of weight to it anyways, where does that come from?
You also do not believe the 2A7 gained more armor, surely they spend decades making a worse version of a vehicle… this is not Russia we’re talking about.
We’re closely monitoring the data and believe that at the moment, there’s no need for an increase to the current Battle Rating threshold for aviation from 12.3 to 12.7
What are you monitoring, because surely it’s not the same game we’re playing.
First thing to get out of the way, like many others I need to say that this transparency is legitimately good thing and I hope it wont be discouraged in the future just because some people cant be civil.
That being said, I do want to hear the explanation as to how Abrams got so much heavier without getting upgraded armor.
I don’t mean to be that guy, but what exactly are players suppose to do here? They say review bombing isn’t a justifiable means of communication but when player after player submits a bug report after bug report, leaves multiple discussions on the forums, links dozens of sources in both saying something was implemented incorrectly or poorly or not at all, and the response from Gaijin is to either do nothing or to just deny it…what’s left but to review bomb?
We players gave you as much information as we could, but you only gave us a perfunctory reply, justifying the 2017 Leopard 2A7V with documents from the last century.
Why don’t you use last century’s T72 armor to justify the 2017 T90M?
I’ll leave you my own personal comments again on STEAM
I would like to know why on gods green earth you guys dont believe the armor was upgraded at all on the later variants of the Abrams and if there actually WASNT any significant enough changes to the armor, why the tank is so high up in BR. The lack of survivability should be enough to have the tank lower in BR simply due to the fact that it cannot keep up with the tanks that are coming out within the game simply based on survivability alone.
I hate jumping on the “Nation Bias” bandwagon, but it feels like you guys at Gaijin just do not want the Abrams to be competitive at all anymore. The tank is the work horse of the US military, and in game right now its a joke.
Regarding Tornado. What kind of explanation is that they are not sure if it could carry a targeting pod.
Isnt WTD61 just name for technical center and there were probably several different Tornadoes tested there with diffrent weapons?
And in game it is not even real specific version of WTD61. It is just copy paste of existing Tornado in game with skin, no?
Just say you do not want to give it guided bombs.
Even if Boris Ludwig Pistorius, minister of defence of Germany, will call to Gajin and say "hey, come to Berlin, i will show to you real Leopard 2A7V and all “sekrit dokuments)))” - Stona and others will answer “nope, your sources are not correct”
The Merkavas are not in great shape as of now,. Sure they can be effective, but they are underperforming when compared to the other top-tier vehicles the other nations are given.
Merkavas don’t need spall-liners at all, this is the smallest of problems the tank has.
Buffing protection would be the best, adding chains on the back of the turret and enhancing the capabilities of it’s composite armour.
You guys are constantly ignoring all those sources and claiming those tanks didnt recieved improved armors, Whats more funny is that people who worked so hard on Leclerc,Abrams and Leopard2A7V reports gave you insane amount of sources that shows how wrongly modelled those tanks are yet all of them got ignored not to mention those people literally did your job, you’re the one who should find those informations before modelling those vehicles not us.
İts clear that you guys have learned nothing from your mistakes and constantly making same mistakes over and over again.
What a joke. Are you guys just disregarding every source you don’t agree with? Why does Gaijin have such an incessant refusal to upgrade the Abrams armor despite all the sources given? I don’t even play U.S. but this is so unfair for them.
The only supersonic jet that causes issues for 9.0s is T-2, F-4C, Nesher, & Mirage 5F. The rest don’t, not even Mig-19 & F-104… F-104 you just turn & win, especially if your 8.3 - 9.0 has AIM-9Bs.
19PT you force horizontal dogfight.
You listed all vehicles that I easily kill in my LIM 5P.
Yak-38, A-4N, Harriers, and Hunter are only danger if they’re on you’re tail.
Out-dogfight them.
The all-aspect missiles of 10.0 cause most of the issues.
