then search for options US F5 got random countermeasure upgrades as well didnt they?
You are only using this for excuses
I’ve argued against the addition of countermeasures on the F-5C nearly in every topic discussing it, I’m strongly against the ahistorical features the YaK-41M and favour more historical loadouts for vehicles, don’t use this false fallacy against me lol.
You are the one stating it as a reason, i said it didnt matter. The A1A1 doesnt forbid the implementation
You are the one searching for excuses here
You’re yet to make a valid enough argument for the AMX-30 S to be introduced into the German TT, your argument is quite literally the definition of cope - you want it because 5% of the parts are German lmao.
If I’m Indian and put a German hat on myself, does that make me ethnically German all of a sudden?
thats again searching for excuses, where does one draw the line? It was modified by germans and is another vehicle, it is a german vehicle. It stands being the same situation as the T-84 Oplot. The degree is different but same situation. By its nature the T-80 only is a modification as well
The difference between the T-84 and the AMX-30 Super is vastly different and shouldn’t be compared to one another, the T-84 is equipped with the KBA3 tank gun, uses a domestically produced turret design, the hull and EVERY single part of the vehicle is manufactured in Ukraine and operates a semi-indigenous FCS.
The AMX-30 S on the other hand is a already existing French AMX-30B which received upgrades from the German, the core of the vehicle itself and a ton of the sub-systems remain French nonetheless.
The main upgrades for the AMX-30 S was the engine, transmission and FCS (thermals are included in the FCS), other than that it remains French - the AMX-30 S furthermore was developed from the already established AMX-30B which itself is a French manufactured, upgraded and designed vehicle.
and still doesnt matter, i can give you multiple quotes of Smin stating canada is not a subtree
That isn’t a consideration when Canada isn’t a sub-TT of any nation in-game, they place Canadian vehicles where its needed and hence why both the US and UK received the Ram II - the UK operated the Ram II anyways so cry me a river.
Why? India is an official subtree of UK, of course they should be able to get access to all indian vehicles.
I only support nation and their subtrees. India is an officaly implemented nation in the game with a home and players should be able to play those line ups.
In the same nature UK received Gripens and France F-16s. Are you calling to get those removed as well
That doesn’t mean the UK should receive the Rafale, the UK doesn’t need it as the entire point of sub-TTs is for them to fill in missing gaps in an already established TT like the UK. Giving the UK TT the Rafale basically makes high tier France pointless lmao (and this is coming from a irl Brit).
Line ups dont have much meaning. BRs are formable and the 0.3 br steps dont matter
LOL, LMAO even!
Gaijin LITERALLY just made a disclosure on why they don’t want to introduce a prototype Leclerc as a premium and their reasoning is that it wouldn’t have a lineup so you’re entirely wrong, lineups ARE indeed considered when introducing vehicles.
you forgot a few things. Like armor kits, road wheels, gunner thermal, cooling system and so on
Don’t forget about the tracks! You’re listing incredibly minor and nuance additions which doesn’t take away from the origins of the AMX-30 S, it still remains French lmao.