Different vehicles handle ammo rack explosions inconsistently based on turret design and ammo storage location:
Type 24 IFV (Crewless Turret, Separated Ammo):
Direct APFSDS hit on ammo storage results in catastrophic explosion + complete vehicle obliteration. Vehicle is destroyed in one hit to the ammo compartment
- Replay (5:38): https://warthunder.com/en/tournament/replay/498392579172146163
- BLK hit replay file:
jp_icv_ifv_prototype_152mm_xm578e1_338.27.blk (1.7 KB)
BTR-82 (Crew-Adjacent Ammo Storage):
- Similar direct hits on ammo storage
- Result: sometime results in simple cook-off, survivable
- Players escape with damaged vehicle, engine running
- I’ve personally escaped multiple times with cook-offs months ago
BMPT (Crew-Adjacent Ammo Storage):
- Ammo stored directly next to crew compartment
- Result: Simple cook-off, not catastrophic
- Vehicle remains mobile after ammo detonation
The Contradiction
Type 24 IFV has separated ammo in a crewless compartment. Theoretically safer for crew. Yet it suffers catastrophic explosion.
BTR-82 and BMPT have ammo directly adjacent to crew. Theoretically more dangerous. Yet they can survive cook-offs.
This suggests ammo rack explosion mechanics are calculated inconsistently based on vehicle nationality or design, not actual storage logic.
Questions
- Why does separated ammo storage cause worse explosions than crew-adjacent storage?
- Are cook-off mechanics different by vehicle type/nation?
- Is this a bug or intentional balance decision?