AFAIK: Tiger Tank 1 told us that F/A-18C is decent premium jet since they can carry tons of napalm.
need to clarify on those though.
3 Likes
if Gaijin would give ur precious Hornet 1280CM and the Su-30SM2’s radar, i’m pretty sure u would still be trash with it.
I’m out here enjoying life, but clearly I’m bothered you all enough to keep you engaged here. You are all embarrassments. It’s cool though, I’m still right and you’re all still wrong. Nothing changed except you guys getting even more hot and bothered. Clown brigade strikes again 🤡
I got a 9K in that too XD, shame my performance in it overall is still terrible
1 Like
i could tell u the song i’m listening rn, the game i’m playing rn, how i’m sitting in my gamer chair and how hot my coffee i’m drinking rn is.
*coffee
my english teacher would be embarrased…
1 Like
but in resume: should F/A-18C Early get a non-existant buff?
Looking through the files on the data leaks, the max range is the only difference.
They have the same power and sensitivity
and TWS target count, none of these differences are that important
Forgot to mention that, yup.
Nothing that would affect the ability to lock and keep a lock.
yeah the problem is that this guy believes that having 20km more in the statcard + 60CM more does some kind of magic that makes the swiss F-18 better than the american one, when in reality the radar is pretty much the same and 60CM more aren’t some kind of game changing thing in reality (except u’re flying the finnish the F/A-18C MLU 2 with ¡1280! BOL CMs). u have aircrafts at the same BR with the same amount of CMs (or less) not struggling at all where they are, but somehow the Hornet C Early of USA struggles with 8/10 missiles, amazing roll rate, good RWR and a very good radar for it’s BR? huh, it’s obviously a problem of the plane itself, not of the player flying it!
Do not create multiple, or duplicate threads for the same topic.
7 Likes