Sure, but doesn’t mean it won’t/can’t change. We’ll just have to wait and see.
I could totally see them making the 15E B and Tornado B different. Just because gaijin… or buffing the B as a whole, and increasing the tornado BR to match (Or just not bother moving it. Rarely see it anyways)
Oh I am aware, but the clipped wing part will stay since its still on the Tornado and that cant change currently, so the issue of ordnance carriage impedance due to the wings should not be an issue on the F-15s.
Litening III doesn’t have higher resolution than Litening ER/AT.
Afaik, Litening II base model is 320x256, Litening ER/AT are 640x512 and Litening III is 640x480. And then make it square instead to fit MFDs. The thought that Litening III is an improvement over Litening II is only correct if we are talking about the base model, but what we have modelled in-game are in fact Litening ER/AT and III models just with the “II” as name, because Gaijin is lazy I guess? But As of now no, Litening III would bring nothing to the table compared to the in-game Litening “II” other than maybe different zoom levels (the max zoom would be definitely a lot better, going from in-game Litening II zoom of ~x50 to almost x100).
The HUD does look fairly properly scaled, the thing about the Wide Angle Raster display is that they are meant to allow for the Navigation pod’s Thermal / low light output to be overlaid with a wider real FoV, in the time before high performance Hemet mounted Night Vison sets were available and able to survive in an air combat arena.