ALR-56C/M changes are ahistorical

From the BAE system website:

The AN/ALR-56C RWR is operational on F-15 aircraft and provides:

Expanded situational awareness for increased survivability.
* Rapid detection of advanced threats in dense environments.
* Detection and identification of modern search, acquisition, and tracking radars of ground- based or aircraft weapon systems.
* Reliable threat warning for effective countermeasure response.

  • Integrated operation with jammer, countermeasures dispenser, and other avionics.
  • User programmability allowing system threat changes after delivery.

while its not explicitly stated, it is heavily implied that it informs the pilot, what, and where, they are being locked from

1 Like

also gentlemen reminder this thread is about the rwr change on the dev server and not your personal beef, go bring that into DM’s and stop cluttering the discussion

7 Likes

Sorry i let my ego went overboard

2 Likes

all good, happens to the best of us

3 Likes

you are aware this will cause all aircraft using these rwr to loose the ability to individually ID many aircraft and SPAA, which is both completely fake and stupid on a balancing standpoint right?

1 Like

You mean aircraft whose BRs/weapons are so much lower that it doesn’t matter. Who cares if F-1C is unidentified?
SPAA which you should be playing as if you’re launched on at all times as ALL SPAA at top-BR have warningless launches.

Pulse radars and pulse doppler radars are not the same.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

1 Like

@Matt_UFP
A pulse radar is NOT a pulse-doppler radar.
They are entirely separate radar systems.
A pulse radar is one like that of F-4C, it is not a pulse doppler radar.
A pulse doppler radar is not a pulse radar.

The difference between pulse and pulse doppler radars is easy to lookup.

Top BR aircraft do not use pulse radars, they use pulse doppler radars, and F-8U is NOT a top BR aircraft.

J-11 doesn’t use a pulse radar either.

Don’t include me in your ridiculous fantasies.

You’re not “everyone”, so please stop pretending you represent the entirety of war thunder’s playerbase.

3 Likes

Weird of you to support my cause, yet you never like posts that defend NATO equipment.

Stop replying to me.

Last warning.

If you continue to harass me with these ridiculous fantasies of yours, I will ask forum mods to get involved.

2 Likes

I will not stand for you including me in your inane ramblings sourced from your ridiculous fantasy world.

Cease at once. I want all NATO tech to be accurate. You defended the choices gaijin made that are ahistorical. You are not part of the consensus here. You are the outlier, defending gaijin’s ridiculous fantasy.

1 Like

@BeautifulTai_wan
So defending AN/ALR-56+ alongside others makes me the outlier?
lolwat?

I’m glad you want NATO to be accurate like I do.

However, AN/ALR-56+ has not been changed for PD radars on dev, just standard “pulse” radars like that of F-4C.

Now, whether or not USA kept the old pulse radar identifications for modern RWRs or not… probably not, but time will tell as we all learn.

I will keep siding with you and everyone else on AN/ALR-46 and other older RWRs I know less about, no matter how much you or others insult me.

AN/ALR-56:

Spoiler





J-8F shows up as F-16.

If yall have personal disagreements, please settle those in PM’s rather than going off topic and making personal attacks in a thread.

2 Likes

I mean gajinn come on now that’s just blatantly stupid