How can it be justified that the Leclerc shares the same BR of 12.7 as tanks like the Abrams M1A2 trophy and SEP V3, Leopard 2A7, T-90M, T-80BVM? Even tanks like Leopard 2A4M and T-80UE-1 at BR 12.0 are equal or better.
Compear Lelcerc to MSC with 3BM60 shell. Lelcerc doesnt have that much more proterction from a BR 11.0 tank.
Compear Leopard 2A4 to Leopard 2A7 agiant 3BM60, a VERY BIG difference
.
2a7 and swedish copies are anything but equal to the rest of the mbts they share a br with
Animal farm reference. I respect that
MSC is fine
S1, S2, Azur should move to 12.3 and have their armor fixed (closer to MSC layout on the hull, at least imprevious to auto canons on the upper plate and middle plate)
SXXI, and possibly XLR - when it comeq - should stay at 12.7 and receive SHARD. SXXI should have its armored fixed on the hull and Gaijin could maybe take the titanium layers into account for the turret
Oh and fix the damn FCS being knocked out from outside the tank
Now Compare Leclrec to the Challenger 2 or Ariete
The challengers and arietes are mostly at BR 11.7. With the addiotn of the the Australia Abrams and Hungarian Leopard 2A7. Kinda like how France got the Dutch Leopard 2A6. The problem is all the leclercs stayed at BR 12.7
Ariete now exceeds Leclerc. Which is a tragedy. Chally and Leclerc are about as sad as one another, whilst not sharing a rating.
We really need armour + mobility corrections for both. Oh, and maybe fixes for the Italians. If we have to.
What the hell is wrong with the armor model or protection analysis? Turret shouldn’t be pennable from anywhere but the gun mantlet