EX is too much of a push probably wait till xmas update for that one.
I expect that and the Su-35S
not really
same ± FM as F-15E, but more missiles and better radar.
with gaijin’s implementation su35 would be just 50km zone of death where you cant do anything against it. due to fact it can notch enemy missiles, while still tracking you
Typhoon with CAPTOR-E Mk2 would be the same.
Su-35S will come this year I think
yep. and thats why it shouldnt be added yet
same for gripen-e btw
it would make it better cus right now it acts like an airbrake with rocket motor
It doesnt have a sustainer, and the dragfix would be of dubious help as it would both increase amd decrease drag.
To answer your question, the Su-27SM is incapable of using the dual pylon. There is not clearance in between the engines for it to fit. The Su-35 has a slightly different airframe which allows it.
As for the Su-30SM, I don’t know if it is the same case, but so far at least, it has not been seen with them.
it was less than a month
Typhoon and Rafale were added less than a month after f15e
1 Like
Prior to that the F-15C with 120s was the best jet.
The E just took it to another level.
yes and no, the Japanese f15c was the best jet, as it is both more maneuverable and gets better missiles than the other 2
but also that was specifically talking about f15e which was meta for less than a month
It merged together only one jet could as high and as fast and that was the F-15C which doninated with 8 120s then Gaijin added the E
So the F-15 was dominant for months
The E model just ensured that.
I haven’t found a single source saying that Su-35S has bigger distance between engines, in fact i only found that Sukhoi had to redesign gondolas because AL-41F-1S is bigger that AL-31F-1, so Su-35S should have even smaller distance between engines than Su-27.
The relevant post is in the Su-27 family discussion thread. I’m not going through 2 separate topics and +10,000 posts to find it.
The margin is literally like centimeters too small to fit the double rack.
it would be nice to have gaijin model the drag resulting performance at transonic, subsonic vs supersonic for all missiles, R77/R77-1 would probably benefit the most from this but all missiles would benefit from this probably. it would probably put the R77 not to far back from the AIM-120A/B in BVR. Also could make gaijin release the AIM-120C5 in an un-nerfed state with it being still being slightly better than the R77-1 in BVR
Also gaijin could start removing the artifical nerfs from late fox3 missiles in game like mica range etc
1 Like
look at the design of r77 they should have high drag
Drag of grid fins only significantly higher at transsonic speed. Grid fins are made of grid, not solid blocks of steel like airbrakes. C’mon guys it’s not that hard to see, even at the photos above you already can see that grid fins consist of extremely thin metal pieces.
2 Likes
grid fins have significantly higher parasite drag at all speeds https://www.icas.org/icas_archive/ICAS2010/PAPERS/261.PDF
3 Likes