it would only remove 2 of them…
not 4
3 Likes
^
and it’s not the point of this thread
Double pylons = 2 missile per pylon?
I get you they would have a single pylon instead
Is it actually incapable or is this just a “it never used them” type of deal.
That was a balancing decision and one that will make the Su-35 the jet that uses double pylons feel less special.
They were designed for Su-35 and Su-27M to my knowledge and not Su-30
the thing with the current Su-27SM is the following:
it has the Upgraded enigines + the N001VEP which were only used on the Su-27SM3
the Su-27SM3 has the 2 extra wing pylons like the Su-33 for example
so they just went the lazy route by giving us the 2 extra missiles through the double pylons, instead of making a new 3d model
1 Like
Su-27M are the first Su-35’s build in the 90tys ( Su-37 is also part of them), the current Su-35 that is in service is the Su-35S
ik to most ppl it dosent make a difference, but i have seen a few ppl on here that were very pedantic about it
1 Like
i hate it when people say Su-35 because that refers to aircrafts of the Su-27M program (the T-10M’s) and not the current Su-35S which has nothing in common with the T-10M’s except the single seat and manufacturer
ik, it’s retarded, still, that doesn’t help at all with the R-77 and R-77-1 drag
2, they still exist as single pylons.
I said that after I had a thought about it.
Sry failed to read quickly enough:(
My fault for being dumb, it’s a nonsense argument from me 2 missiles wont make any difference. I’m just a little salty as a British main right now ha ha
1 Like
seems a lot of british mains are salty :) (preparing for salt blast)
i would also want 2 extra amraams on the EF as a german main
1 Like
the truly sad part was in the leaklist where the R-27EA was mentionned as under consideration, implying gaijin does not wanna fix the drag of the R-77 and R-77-1 and would rather add a missile with only a mockup built rather than fix their shit
1 Like
I was gonna play Britain but decided against it cause I wanna play Ho229. I get it EF sucks a bit Rn, but I think F15E need to go 14.7for these C5s if they have real life range.
We are having a rough time of it with this update ha ha
The missiles will be good/great but the airframe can’t defend like the Eurocanards can and that’s why it shouldn’t be higher.
This should really being the F-15E back into some form of the meta. If the missiles do become lethal and impossible to defend then yeah it will need to go up.