Aim120C r-77-1 for jets

Dev Server "Storm Warning" General Discussion - Dev Server
,
1

The rafale jet fighter will gain the mica ng missile which is on data mine, other may gain counterparts?

2

No, the Rafale won’t get the MICA NG, the only thing datamined was the pylon.

14 Likes
3

Pls not, ARH spam is already callanging enough. There is no need for missiles with more range which are even harder to avoid

4

There needs to be a counter to the aim-120a/b tho

5

No, only starting with the f4.2 the rafale can use mica ng and it’s still not a thing irl, we got in game the f4.1.

6

yes, and thats not adding new missiles. thats called pushing enough to get the R-77, MICA and Derby/R-Darter to be properly modeled

3 Likes
7

And if not? The R-77-1 would still be better than nothing.

1 Like
8

ok so if the R-77-1 gets added and its better then the 120A/B, guess what american players complain about it till the 120C gets added and we have the same issue again.

image
image1440×1800 160 KB

16 Likes
9

Kittyyyyyyy
I mean there is still the r-37 what the su-35 could carry but thats the plane what we probably will see in the next five years ( or the mig-31).

10

It’s inevitable at this point. The only solutions are maybe bigger maps, and definitely just getting used to it.

I personally can’t get used to the new top tier right now because for me it’s really laggy in fps which makes it harder to be aware of your surroundings, so until I get my new PC I’m going to be playing lower tier jets.

2 Likes
11

Sorry to say that but thats not true. Bigger maps will end the same but you need to flight 8mins instead of 5 to get to the action (those numbers are a bit to big but just to make clear what i mean) There are some bigger maps in the rotation but thats even worse. What could help is when we get more airfields all over the place so that we get more of a front line rather than just a blob of enemies.

2 Likes
12

R-77-1 is already overdue

13

My opinion, 6 fighter aircraft top tier could get AIM-120C-5 and R-77-1

  • MiG-29SMT 9-19 (R-77-1)
  • F-15C MSIP II (AIM-120C-3 & AIM-120C-5)
  • F-15E (AIM-120C-3, AIM-120C-5 & AIM-120C-7)
  • F-16C Block 50 (AIM-7M & AIM-120A replace with AIM-120C-5 & AIM-120C-7)
  • JAS 39 C EBS HU (AIM-120C-5 instead AIM-120A)
  • (THA) Gripen C (AIM-120B replace with AIM-120C-5)
1 Like
14

Or that. And why apologize?

15

So that none feels offended. Had this happen a few times in this forum where ppl just randomly feel offended and I don’t want to deal with that…

1 Like
16

I’d suggest bigger maps and a more spread out frontline, with more varied objectives. if you only stretch out the frontline you still end up having people engaged seconds after taking off, and said frontline collapsing right away at the slightest imbalance leading to airfield camping. Especially with the addition of Amraam-C and better missiles, whose No-Escape Zone would make most of the map unuseable given the current map sizes. I think the current EC maps are the minimum for size at top tier, so one has space to get to altitude and position, or evade fighters if you like playing strike aircraft. I remember there being a leak about strategic bomber testing being considered even

17

the thing is
Aim-120C is far closer to R-27EA than it is to R-77-1, which is closer to aim-120b if gaijin refuses to fix variable drag on missiles

18

The problem with this is that most ppl want more arcady games. Long matches won’t make the avergae player enjoy the game more they want action and thats the problem.

19

This is probably a no, but was the Pylon used on the VL MICA NG launcher (MICA NG SPAA, basically)?

20

Nope, it’s a pylon for the Rafale.